Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I need some help on this Karl Rove LTTE, please

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 06:00 PM
Original message
I need some help on this Karl Rove LTTE, please
Edited on Tue Jul-12-05 06:44 PM by GreenPartyVoter
I'm going to go get the actual wording of the DSM and Plame's mission right, but I also need absolute proof on what it was Karl Rove was fired by Poppy Bush for back in the day. Anyone have a link for that, or at least an idea of what it was so I can do a more specific google?

(I'm doin this for Andy and Keph and all the other good DUers who aren't here any more to stick it to the BFEE, but who would wants us to keep up the good fight. So please help me make this thing tight as can be?)

*************************************************************************

There are many questions surrounding the issue of who blew CIA agent Valerie Plame’s cover in retaliation for her husband, Ambassador Wilson, revealing as forgeries the Niger yellowcake uranium documents that provided "proof" for pushing forward with the Iraq war.

For example, are these forgeries what was meant by the Downing Street memo which stated that the “intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy" of going to war in Iraq?

Who authorized the revelation of Ambassador Wilson’s wife as an undercover weapons of mass destruction operative for the CIA, thus putting her mission and dozens of other operatives at risk?

Why did former Attorney General Ashcroft remove himself from the leak investigation?

If the leak indeed came from a member or members of his staff will President Bush, who promised honor and integrity in the White House, stand by his word and “deal” with the person who created the leak as he promised way back in 2003?

And why is the White House changing its story from “it’s ridiculous” to think that Karl Rove is involved in the leak, that they’ve “made it very clear, he was not involved, that there's no truth to the suggestion that he was” to “This is an ongoing investigation at this point. The president directed the White House to cooperate fully with the investigation, and as part of cooperating fully with the investigation, that means we're not going to be commenting on it while it is ongoing.” Have they been hiding something for two years, or does President Bush have so little control over what his staff does, including Karl Rove, a man his own father once fired for leaking a negative story about Bush supporter Robert Mosbacher to none other than columnist Bob Novak, who features in the Plame story as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here are about 24,000 links
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks! I knew it was to Novakula but didn't have a date or subject
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick for more thoughts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalfriend Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks for the bump :^) Got any suggestions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalfriend Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. ABOUT ASHCROFT
wouldn't he have to in order to maintain the "aura" of integrity? I think him being involved in the leak investigation would be a massive issue due to the fact that it delt with the white house. That sort of thing would not have helped things at this point if he had stayed on until he left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. here are some more
http://search.looksmart.com/p/search?qt=lee+atwater+karl+rove&tb=dir&ca=us302562

This is about where Karl learned his chops. This scum has been around for a long time. Too long. Bye bye Karl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC