Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush perjury?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
choie Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 06:40 PM
Original message
Bush perjury?
I can dream, can't I?

Let's stipulate that most likely Bush (and probably Cheney)has been aware all this time that Rove was the leaker in the plame investigation. Now, when Bush went in front of the Grand Jury in the Plame case, he must have been asked if he knew who had outed her or even more specifically, whether he knew if Rove had done it. If Bush testified that he didn't know - wouldn't this be perjury?:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. HILIARY!!!!!!!
You have a mouth, USE IT!!

Let's start the 2008 election, NOW!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unschooler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's only perjury if the opposing party controls the Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Nope.
Perjury is perjury. Professional prosecutors see it that way.
Welome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unschooler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Thanks for the welcome! You are correct of course,
but where is this professional prosecutor going to come from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Fitzgerald, the one going after Rove, for one.
Really, not everyone in the Justice Department, or other departments, for that matter, is a political appointee. The government is made up by far of professionals who take their work very seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unschooler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Hmmm.... That's very encouraging!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fiona Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. When was Bush put under oath before a Grand Jury?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bush went in front of the grand jury?
Really? that's news to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
choie Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. am i wrong? I was sure that he testified
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I don't think so
I also don't think that anyone in the administration has spoken to the grand jury yet. I think certain ones, like Rove, did speak to Fitzgerald while he was still investigating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Son of California Donating Member (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Perjury?
maybe we don't have the votes in the Senate yet to get Bush on perjury, but we might have enough after the mid-term elections.
There are Republicans in the Senate who will support an investigation if enough evidence starts to surface, or -even better!- if they feel strong pressure from their constituents. Either way, the best thing we can do is keep this in the public eye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Again, it doesn't take Congress to bring a perjury charge.
It takes a prosecutor and a grand jury. It takes the House to impeach and the Senate to convict.
Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC