Liberal "ANGER"

[jcv1]

The rupukes seem to be getting a lot of milage out of a consistent theme of dismissal by blaming libs with misplaced "anger". When will the Dems unite with a message that it sure appeared to be "love" directed at Clinton for so many years??????

[Jade Fox]

1. Check this out.....

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=4085608&mesg_id=4085608

[Arkana]

2. When one party owns the media, it's kinda hard to get a message out.

Although the way things are going, we may not need anything like that.

[grannylib]

3. That one confuses me more than almost any of the myriad hypocrisies

so blatantly displayed by the Reich Wing.

Their memories are so short you'd think they were all suffering severe brain injury. The hatred and viciousness that were directed at Clinton and his family were unparallelled - and largely personal smears. The "hatred" for Bush and the neo-con-jobs is hatred of policies, actions, principles, hypocrisy, etc. but the Rethuglicans cry "smear! personal attack! waaaahhhhh!" at every turn!

Projection. Freud musta been right about something, even if it wasn't cigars.

[NAO]

4. The ANGER and CONTEMPT of GHW Bush for INSIDIOUS TRAITORS like Rove...

"Even though I'm a tranquil guy now at this stage of my life, I have nothing but contempt and anger for those who betray the trust by exposing the name of our sources. They are, in my view, THE MOST INSIDIOUS OF TRAITORS."

-- George Herbert Walker Bush, 1999

[omega minimo]

5. Dear DUers WHY do you FALL for this?

Consider the source.

[Humor_In_Cuneiform]

6. We have a lot to be angry about

Anger is a healthy reaction to being lied to, deceived, betrayed.

And Repubs have been verbally assaulting us for decades.

About all that needs to be said, AFAICS.