"Tweety" Matthews & The Gang on "Teeball" are Whirling Dervishes Tonight

[Vinnie From Indy]

Why don't these cable news pricks just start wearing "BushCo" lapel pins? Tweety, Mehlman, Andrea Mitchell and David Gergen just ran through the Rove talking points. I don't think they missed a single one.

[Mojambo]

1. You didn't expect anything different did you?

If so, how long have you been visiting planet Earth?

You are watching right-wing funded propaganda. Turn it off.

[Democrat 4 Ever]

2. I'm watching the show and yelling at the TV set. These guys

are fricking unbelievable.

Mitchell made the statement that this is going no where. That no one outside of the DC media gives a hoot. Just move along, nothing to see.

Then Rogers thinks all he has to do is say that Wilson is a Democratic operative and the world will right itself and things will move on, business as usual.

This can't be just Kool Aid. What in the hell are these a$$wipes drinking? Seriously. Rove must have really been working the phones hard today.

I wish I was inside the offices of Hardball. I can only imagine what Tweety's email looks like night after night.

I hate everything these people stand for and what they have done to my country.

[Jawja]

3. The corporate

media will go down with the whole gang. They are slowly being replaced by the new American free press: the internet.

They are not serving the public good. They are serving their money masters.

[Check12]

4. Talking point spin that Karl was just warning Mat Cooper

about that bad Joe Wilson character. Well Mr. Matthews, how does all that jive with the fact that you, you miserable excuse for a journalist talked to Karl Rove yourself did you not? And what did Karl tell you Mr. Hardball? Oh yea, "Valerie Plame was fair game" how does that fit with the 'it was just a warning to Cooper theory' you propagandist creeps. Matthews never disclosed his own conversation with Rove and the implications of that conversation. That makes him a pathetic hack. If this show had any balance at all that point would be offered in rebuttal to the talking point, sadly they can't defend the indefensible so they choose to exclude dissent.