Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can someone give me one unbiased example of Wilson's "dishonesty"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 11:43 AM
Original message
Can someone give me one unbiased example of Wilson's "dishonesty"?
Sorry, to be so dense, but I haven't watched corporate media in months. The last time I did, Joe Wilson's story seemed to be accepted even by the corporate media whores. It seemed to be common knowledge that he was telling the truth.

Now I hear that he's a liar. I heard a clip of various right wingers calling him that on Ed Shultz, but didn't hear a defense. I've seen reference to these accusations in thread titles here on DU. But I never seem to hear or read exactly what he did nor said that was dishonest.

So what did he supposedly say that was untrue? And if he didn't lie, why don't we have surrogates out there saying EXACTLY why this is B.S?:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good luck at find one, I don't know of an unbiased (or even accurate) one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. I can't give you one but I can give you an example of right wing distortio
Mehlman and others have been peddling the idea that Wilson at some point claimed Cheney had sent him to Niger. Wilson never said that, but the truth doesn't matter to these sick f**ks, especially when their backs are against the wall.

http://www.cafepress.com/scarebaby/702950
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks for the example
I thought it was something ridiculous like that. But I still don't understad why we aren't countering it then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. to answer your last question...
the reason the surrogates aren't debunking this is because Wilson isn't the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. He isn't the main issue
but the repukes are smearing him with lies and it only takes a few seconds to debunk lies. I don't see any point in letting them stand. The lies may seem ridiculous to us, and we may be able to see through them, but most * voters can't. And in the PR war, you need to fight back on many levels. The Dems simply won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I think people can see the irrelevance
in fact, you'd have to puzzle over it to see the relevance at all, or even to rememeber who Wilson is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. A word on Facism ....
* exalts the nation, (and sometimes the race or culture) above the individual, with the state apparatus being supreme.
* stresses loyalty to a single leader.
* uses violence and modern techniques of propaganda and censorship to forcibly suppress political opposition.
* engages in severe economic and social regimentation.
* engages in a syndicalist form of corporatism.
* implements totalitarian systems.

And I might add pulls facts out of their ass. ;) Peace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. LOL
So true, but then it should be easy to call them on it, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. You would think so .....
but for the state of our 'Corporate owned Media'... though I am quite proud of the journalists at the Scotty Roasts lately. Still the news channels let these lies get started and don't follow up with the calling out of these lies! And you have the FAUX network blatantly propagating this b.s. ... anyway ... must calm down, must breath, must get air now..... ;) .... all we can do is tell the truth. Hang in there, Peace. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Is the investigation about Mr. Wilson...or the outting of his wife?
What does Wilson have to do with the outting of his wife's name? Seems like a GOP MO to dirty the water distraction-distraction- distraction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Clearly Rove is directing his own "public" defense
because this smear campaign of Ambassador Wilson is a typical Rovian tactic.

http://www.cafepress.com/scarebaby/702950
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC