Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rove, Novak (Apparently) Contradict One Another

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 04:53 PM
Original message
Rove, Novak (Apparently) Contradict One Another
Chief presidential adviser Karl Rove testified to a grand jury that he talked with two journalists before they divulged the identity of an undercover CIA officer but that he originally learned about the operative from the news media and not government sources, according to a person briefed on the testimony.

The person, who works in the legal profession and spoke only on condition of anonymity because of grand jury secrecy, told the Associated Press that Rove testified last year that he remembers specifically being told by columnist Robert Novak that Valerie Plame, the wife of a harsh Iraq war critic, worked for the CIA.

Associated Press, July 15, 2005

Novak, in an interview, said his sources had come to him with the information. "I didn't dig it out, it was given to me," he said. "They thought it was significant, they gave me the name and I used it."

New York Newsday, July 21, 2003

***

This article first appeared at Journalists Against Bush's B.S. (JABBS)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmm... the plot thickens!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sadly enough, I believe Nofacts before I believe the Traitor.
strange, the day you trust him over someone else :freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niallmac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. NoFacts!? Now THAT is funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Welcome to DU...
Edited on Sat Jul-16-05 12:23 AM by Endangered Specie
I didnt come up with the term, but its fairly popular, not to mention accurate :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qanisqineq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Novak will change his story
he'll suddenly remember that it wasn't the way he said. yeah, someone will remind him that his memory is wrong. "oh yeah, I did tell Rove her name. golly, what was I thinking?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Like the purloined letter, that the answer is in plain sight
Who used the name PLAME to Novak? Everyone keeps saying they didn't know her, didn't know her name. Who knew her as Plame instead of Wilson? A maiden name is far more esoteric than a married name. The State Dept. memo on the trip to Africa that people are calling the possible source of the story refers to her as Wilson.

And who knew even MORE esoteric information - her cover company?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. how many leaks
If Novak didn't get his information from Rove, then Rove can't be one of his two administration sources.

So can we assume there are three administration sources, one of whom used "Valerie Plame" instead of "Valerie Wilson"?

Indeed, the plot thickens ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. And that is why Novak is NOT in jail.
He was the first to save his skin. You all KNOW that don't ya?

I mean, Novak is not jailed because he REVEALED HIS SOURCE....and he was first in line to do so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-05 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. said his sources had come to him with the information.
He is not in jail so I take it he has given up his source. Anyone know what he has to say about Miller? :shrug: Novak is the worst sort of scum. absolutely no respect or principles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC