|
Edited on Mon Jul-18-05 11:34 AM by PurityOfEssence
They've not been shown to be forgeries, and anyone who calls them such has the burden of proof.
We know that his secretary typed similar memos which have since been purged by then-Governor Junior. (By the way, why isn't THAT a huge-ass story?) We also know that the man wasn't a typist and was fairly cautious. In addition to all that, the time-line is very plausible and the typewriter that would have created these documents is consistent with the kind he would have had access to.
Add all this up, and we have a strong case that he covered his own ass by having his Secretary type official memos that he knew would be in jeopardy by the powers-that-be, and so he covered it again by personally typing additional ones for backup. Considering that they're VERY short and there's at least one formatting typo, this certainly fits with him having done it. The ONLY plausible nit I've heard picked is that some of the jargon was more consistent with Armyspeak than Air Forcespeak.
Regardless, the documents that have been uncovered are photocopies, so authentication is nigh impossible. There IS one more step that can certainly answer some questions: do a forensic analysis of the photocopied "originals" and see if paper, toner and potential stress markings are consistent with the kind of copiers that would have existed in facilities where they would have been found. Since copiers change fairly frequently, this may yield something.
The persistent story that Rove or some other operative created these to sucker CBS into stubbing its toe doesn't sit well with me, and has fueled endless fear and speculation about the sophistication of these primitives. To have done something like that is INCREDIBLY risky, and their first responses were clumsy.
Anyone else with me on this?
|