Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My email and a response about Mehlman and NAACP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
clydefrand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 12:35 PM
Original message
My email and a response about Mehlman and NAACP
Yesterday, when Mehlman was making a fool of himself, he said made the statements as found in my email to NAACP. Thought you might like to know what their response to me is.

"Thank you for contacting the NAACP Washington Bureau regarding Mr.
Mehlman's misstatement about the late James Byrd. We very much appreciate
that you are on top of reality and that you have made the contacts that you
did to correct this gross error.

We will certainly make every attempt to ensure that Mr. Mehlman recognizes
and corrects his error.

Thank you again for contacting the NAACP and pointing this out to us."


My email to them:


To: washingtonbureau@naacpnet.org
Sent: 7/17/2005 8:04 PM
Subject: Quote from a CNN transcript for 7/17/05

I have sent the below communication to three different entities on
CNN...Late Edition, Wolf Blitzer, and to Errors on CNN. I hope that you
will want to correct Mr. Mehlman's grave mistake. He doesn't know what
he's talking about since Karl Rove has gotten him and the administration
into hot water. Perhaps he never did but he certainly is making the
rounds on all the Sunday shows as well as the ones during the week
spouting off his "talking points" that he made up for dispersal by all
his cronies.



K.Mehlman's quote when being interviewed by John King:

Re: Transcript online from CNN's Late Edition with John King sitting in
for Wolf Blitzer:
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0507/17/le.01.html
<http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0507/17/le.01.html>

"I certainly will, going forward, if either party engages in things
which are racially polarizing unnecessarily -- for instance, a good
example, in 1998, the Democrat Party put up ads in Missouri that said --
I mean, this is appalling -- that said, "Every time you don't vote, a
church burns. Vote Democratic." That's an appalling example.

The NAACP unfortunately in the 2000 campaign likened the president to
James Byrd, who was a racist killer in east Texas, who the president
brought to justice."

I believe that James Byrd was the victim of a vicious murder wherein he
was dragged behind a vehicle with his throat slit. Mr. Mehlman needs to
get his facts straight. Mr. King was remiss in not picking up on this
outright lie of Mr. Mehlman's.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yewberry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. "We very much appreciate that you are on top of reality"
That is priceless.

Excellent job, Clyde.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good for you for pointing this out.
Thanks for being on top of reality. Nominated. bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Racially polarizing
I certainly will, going forward, if either party engages in things
which are racially polarizing unnecessarily


So he denounced the Willie Horton ads? :sarcasm:
And Trent Lott's claim that we wouldn't have all these problems if the segregationist won in 1948? :sarcasm:
And...and...and...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrible beauty Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. racially polarizing UNNECESSARILY
racially polarizing "UNNECESSARILY" WTF UNNECESSARILY
These people are a slimy bunch of bas@#$@s and you have to watch every
damn word that escape their lying lips.
Question that he should have been asked .
When is racially polarizing NECESSARY ?
TO WIN AN ELECTION of course.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatchWhatISay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. I am so glad you did this
Edited on Mon Jul-18-05 04:32 PM by WatchWhatISay
I heard this too, and it really disturbed me. I didnt think to send it to the NAACP, but I am glad you did.

Can you imagine if he had made this mistake when he spoke at the NAACP? You think the GOP could afford better research that this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carla in Ca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Saying it at the NAACP would have been a disaster
but I think the damage is done, wherever he said it. You gotta think that he had just too little time to go over his notes about that horrible incident. He just didn't have enough time to memorize the details before he talked about it, which makes the attempt to 'reach out' to blacks even more transparent and pathetic.

If you know the story, if you have a heart, you do not make such a mistake. As a member of the NAACP, I am aware of how the RNC works and the use of such tactics; he had no business talking about it at all, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC