Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking.....Bush nominates Alabama's Judge Roy Moore for SC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 08:02 PM
Original message
Breaking.....Bush nominates Alabama's Judge Roy Moore for SC
Bush announced today in order for the media to get off his back on the Traitorgate Affair
to nominate someone who would never get the votes in the senate for Supreme Court Justice,
but would as Rove suggested, bring up a big media storm, taking the heat off of the current media storm until the next media storm.

Judge Roy Moore nomination is seen as a brilliant move by republican strategist because he brings so many controversial qualifications and opinions to the table.
The ten commandments, God, Christianity
someone that was removed from his job by the court,
and idiot statements and actions,
such as:

1. "United States was founded as a Christian nation and that Christians should “take back our land.”

2. he opened court sessions with prayers led by a local clergyman.



Even though he has a snowball chance in Hell being confirmed, the media is looking forward to this new distraction until the Saddam trial can begin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. You are kidding...
right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. yes, but wouldn't that nomination take the heat off for a while?
Meanwhile they have serious contenders that they could bring up later

SORRY I FORGOT THE SARCASM SIMILIES IN THE ORIGINAL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Phew...
The reason I even wondered is because I have actually suspected that the boy idiot might actually appoint Moore just to stick the Dem's nose in it. I guess I was too much expecting it. Arggghhh, don't scare me like that! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Sorry, but I put nothing beyond these creeps
It would energize his religious fundy base and cause controversy
even if he had and will have
no chance of passing,
I'm expecting some major misdirection and redirection
by these assholes with the nomination to focus the masses away from reality.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wrong Thread. Deleted.
Edited on Mon Jul-18-05 08:31 PM by applegrove
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. You almost gave me a HEART ATTACK
Please don't do that. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. I would not be surprised. This would fire up the rpig base. He would
make it through the Senate after they did the nuclear option. Senate rpigs would be loyal on a nominee that appeals to their base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wallwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. It had to be a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. You laugh now, that's not out of the question...
You know that's the Dems worst nightmare, especially after the Nuclear Battle. Cheney's been breathing down all thier necks ever since and now they are essentially without a constituency. The Fundies want to hang them and the moderate Republicans have no voice so don't look for the fabulous 14 to hold in the Supreme Court battle.

I don't think the Dems are fucking around this time. I've been looking for signs of a horse trade and it looks as though the Rove affair may just the pony the Dems are betting on. You watch and see, Rove will walk from this but we may get a decent SC Justice. I don't know if that's a smart trade or not but I'd trade Rove for an honest justice any day. Rove will be gone in 3 years whereas a sitting Justice can stick around for 33. Yeah, I'd hate it but I'd trade. Unless of course they think they can get both, Rove incarcerated and a good Justice. That may be a bit too much to hope for.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kazak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'd say the Nuclear Option has even less chance now...
as it did when Frist first threatened it. I'm thinking that boat has sailed. Bush tries to nominate Moore, Dems filibuster, Frist invokes the Nuclear Option which falls flat...we got 'em right where we want 'em. Meanwhile, the Plame grand jury hands down indictments, because those wheels are in motion and it really doesn't much matter if the public is paying attention or not. So I say, bring it on, as it were...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. Locking.
In the future, please post jokes in the Lounge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC