mentioned in an interview with Joe Wilson, which he says on his blog recently, took place in September, 2003!
Gannon himself now says that no media outlet, other than the WSJ had mentioned the memo. They, however, didn't mention it until October, 2003.
Strange that, since he was visited by the FBI after his interview with Wilson was published by Talon in October, 2003. He drew their attention by implying he had had access to the Memo, but when confronted by the FBI, claimed he had read about it in the Press. The only article about it appeared in the WSJ in October, 2003.
Two weeks ago on his own blog, he seems to be contradicting himself again, claiming once again that he had special access to the memo, apparently either forgetting what he told the FBI, or baiting them?
This exchange between Gannon and someone called John Galt in March, 2004 on Freerepublic is interesting now, even more so, since it was before he was outed as a fake journalist by bloggers amongst other things.
To: ConservativeMajority
Mr.Gannon is not being truthful when he says he does not know why he is being subpoenaed. When he interviewed Wilson last October he made reference to "an internal government memo" purporting to be the minutes of a meeting at which Plame played a key role in getting her husband the Niger assignment.
From the interview: TN: An internal government memo prepared by U.S. intelligence personnel details a meeting in early 2002 where your wife, a member of the agency for clandestine service working on Iraqi weapons issues, suggested that you could be sent to investigate the reports. Do you dispute that?
Since the Niger Uranium documents have been judged forgeries, Gannon is suggesting that he was made privy to counterfeit official/government documents which is a crime, and a separate crime at that and logically he would be hauled in front of a grand jury probing the Plame affair.
7 posted on 03/09/2004 7:12:26 AM PST by JohnGalt (If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied. -- R. Kipling).....
To: JohnGalt
Your professed insight into the motivation of the Grand Jury is merely guesswork.
The document in question has never been acknowleged by any government agency to even exist.
This is a one-sided investigation where people are being accused of crimes for revealing names and information that may have not been secret in the first place.
11 posted on 03/09/2004 7:53:13 AM PST by Jeff Gannon (Listen to my radio show "Jeff Gannon's Washington" on www.RIGHTALK.com)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies >http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1093819/posts?page=18It's a very interesting exchange ~
What's become really important now, is when did Gannon actually interview Joe Wilson, September or October? In his latest comment on this, he says September. On June 30th, 2005 this is what he says:
I acquired knowledge of the memo and the Wall Street Journal reported on it, but no other media outlet mentioned it. I confronted Wilson about it in a September 2003 interview, for which I was rewarded by a visit from two FBI agents. All of the their questions surrounded the document they could "neither confirm nor deny" even existed. They were not interested in what I had heard that suggested a cell at the agency was actively undermining the Bush administration, payback for being blamed for not preventing the 9/11 attacks. When Porter Goss became the CID in 2004, some familiar names quickly headed for the exits. Grumblings from faithful leakers to the mainstream press indicated that Goss was looking into this.http://www.jeffgannon.com/archives/2005/06/plame_probe_may.html#commentsAs mentioned before, the Wall Street Journal DID mention the memo, but not until October. Since no other media outlet mentioned this memo, and if Gannon is NOW telling the truth that he asked Wilson about it in September, who told him about it? I believe his excuse to the FBI was that he had read about it in the media. Talon News didn't post his Wilson interview until October. But if the interview took place in Sept. which he now claims, then it was not from the media that he got his info.
If true, did he lie to Federal agents about where he heard about the memo? Wonder if the FBI is reading Jeff's website? They might find his June 30th entry very interesting. I see someone asked him on his site in the 'comments section' for the date in September on which he interviewed Joe Wilson. That was on July 2nd. He hasn't answerered.