Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Freepers fear Clement may be "Souter-in-Skirts", call her a "Bimbo"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
GeorgeBushytail Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 12:16 PM
Original message
Freepers fear Clement may be "Souter-in-Skirts", call her a "Bimbo"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1445916/posts

I know nothing about her yet, but it's nice to know that the Freepers are nervous. Excerpts for those who get ill visiting Freeperville:

"Good grief, the bimbo talks about "hate crimes" as if they're legitimate... what kind of "strict constitutionalist" is THAT???"

"If the left seems okay with this selection we are in trouble."

"You are indeed correct. If they are not spewing venom in a death struggle, we have the wrong nominee. Social conservatives will not endure another "Gee, sorry, I thought he/she was conservative.""

"I'm merely stating that Roe is one of those things that is settled law, until it isn't."

"Comparing this woman to Souter is unfair. The Dems will filibuster any candidate with a clear anti-Roe record. The trick is squeezing someone through has done enough glossing about "the right to privacy" to avoid a total spaz out. We only need somebody who is slightly more conservative than O'Connor to tip this thing. No need to over-reach."

"According to the Drudge article, she passes the abortion litmus test. That is to say, she is pro-abortion."

"Any statement declaring Roe to be settled law worries me, though."

---

Maybe we should start a thread praising Clement to the skies just to put their knickers in a twistier twist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StevieM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Clement is a member of the Federalist Society....
that is a real bad sign. I think she will be safely right-wing.

Steve
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The Secret Handshake Society
is pre-req for Bush's appointees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wild potato Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Her Federalist Society membership...
...is the only real clue I have yet seen of her general philosophical outlook, and it certainly indicates that she is a conservative. This shouldn't surprise us. Bush said a million times he would appoint a conservative. Why would we expect him to do otherwise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. These days, belonging to the Federalist Society is no big deal.
Any ambitious Republican lawyer pretty much has to be a member -- it's more like a businessman having to be a member of the country club where all the deals are made in order to be successful. I wouldn't attribute too much meaning to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. There's a difference between "Conservative" & "Raving Right Wing Loon"
If the Freepers are upset, she might have some redeeming qualities. No, I don't expect Bush to nominate a Liberal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisassemblingHisLies Donating Member (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Note the comment by one who is thinking-impaired...
Edited on Tue Jul-19-05 12:30 PM by DisassemblingHisLies
"If the left seems okay with this selection we are in trouble."


Instead of taking the initiative to research the facts to learn what he can about the possible nominee, this freeper apparently chooses to base his opinion on how the left reacts. The lazy route.

No doubt he uses that mindset when voting, too. If only there were a mandatory test about candidates' policies before voting...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Tell him the Left believes Republicans should not ingest sulphuric acid nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. They suspect her because they suspect Bush
Bush is going to say that his nominee is in the mainstream while winking at the fundies, and fundies aren't sure who Bush is lying to.

They know he's lying to somebody, and somebody is going to get screwed by a secret agenda. They just don't know if its moderate America or them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. This woman does seem like a potential
mstake by Bush. Where is the paper trail on Abortion and AA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MN ChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Maybe she's Pickles' pick
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wallwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Anything that upsets the freepers
sounds at least promising to me. I wonder if * really wants this one, or if they are just throwing her to the wolves?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. we should have a thread of praise for this person (knowing nothing
about her myself) to simply freak the right out.

oh that would be funny, to go on and on about what a wonderful choice she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC