Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Morton Kondracke: Will Frist back stem cell research?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:56 PM
Original message
Morton Kondracke: Will Frist back stem cell research?
MORTON KONDRACKE ROLL CALL

Will Frist back stem cell research?

July 19, 2005

The Senate's stem cell debate forces a moment of truth upon Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn.: Is he, at bottom, a doctor and scientist dedicated to saving lives, or just an ambitious politician out to advance his career?

At the moment, the evidence suggests the latter – that he's working to peel votes away from legislation that would hasten stem cell research and in the process give himself and his party political cover.

Polls consistently show that as many as two-thirds of voters support federal funding of medical research using embryos left over at in-vitro fertilization clinics and otherwise destined for destruction. Even many evangelical Christians and Roman Catholics support the research.

But the religious right wing of the Republican Party and the right-to-life movement – which probably have veto power over GOP presidential nominees – strongly oppose the research on the grounds that the embryos constitute sacrosanct "human life."

To the dismay of many who admire him, this would not be the first time Frist has allowed his ambition to trump his scientific judgment and put him in league with the ideologues.

In July 2001, after serious study and soul-searching, he bucked the right wing and endorsed federal funding of embryonic research within proper ethical guidelines. But then in August 2001, Frist saluted when President Bush limited the funding to stem cells obtained prior to that time and supported the Bush claim that researchers would have as many as 60 batches (or "lines") of stem cells to work with. It turns out that only 22 lines are available and all are contaminated, making them unsuitable for use in humans.

More..

Find this article at:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20050719/news_lz1e19kond.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemGirl7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm willing to bet he doesn't back stem cell research
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC