Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Will Nominate John Roberts (The Left Coaster)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:16 PM
Original message
Bush Will Nominate John Roberts (The Left Coaster)
Edited on Tue Jul-19-05 07:18 PM by ailsagirl
From The Left Coaster
Steve Soto
July 19, 2005

Several news outlets are reporting that Bush will announce the nomination of John Roberts in an hour. As I said several days ago, given the dynamics in play and that Bush could have gone with someone even farther right than Roberts, this to me is a safe choice.

I find it interesting that according to the SAO, Bush didn't offer the nomination to Roberts until early this afternoon, after the stories about Edith Clement were already out there for several hours. Roberts is more conservative than Clement, but not as bad as others Bush could have chosen. Did Bush have someone else in mind and then change course and go with Roberts as a compromise between the "go with a woman" crowd and the American Taliban?

We'll see what he says and how it plays out. As I said, I would rather not have Roberts but given the dynamics and the alternatives, I can live with him based on what I know of him now. But I do wonder about the backstory here, how the Hispanic bloc will react, and how those who wanted a woman to replace O'Connor will react to another white male being put on the court, especially after Clement was left hanging out there for most of the day.


http://www.theleftcoaster.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wapo reports that Roberts is not a "movement" conservative.
Edited on Tue Jul-19-05 07:29 PM by flpoljunkie
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/20...



John G. Roberts, 50, has long been considered one of the Republicans' heavyweights amid the largely Democratic Washington legal establishment. Roberts was appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in 2003 by President George W. Bush. (He was also nominated by the first President Bush, but never received a Senate vote). Previously, he practiced law at D.C.'s Hogan & Hartson from 1986-1989 and 1993-2003. Between 1989 and 1993, he was the Principal Deputy Solicitor General in the first Bush administration, helping formulate the administration's position in Supreme Court cases. During the Reagan administration, he served as an aide to Attorney General William French Smith from 1981-1982 and as a an aide to White House Counsel Fred Fielding from 1982-1986.

With impeccable credentials -- Roberts attended Harvard College and Harvard Law School, clerked for Justice William H. Rehnquist on the Supreme Court and has argued frequently before the court -- the question marks about Roberts have always been ideological. While his Republican party loyalties are undoubted, earning him the opposition of liberal advocacy groups, he is not a "movement conservative," and some on the party's right-wing doubt his commitment to their cause. His paper record is thin: as Deputy Solicitor General in 1990, he argued in favor of a government regulation that banned abortion-related counseling by federally-funded family planning programs. A line in his brief noted the Bush administration's belief that Roe v. Wade should be overruled.

As a judge on the D.C. Circuit, Roberts voted with two colleagues to uphold the arrest and detention of a twelve-year old girl for eating french fries on the Metro train, though his opinion noted that "no one is very happy about the events that led to this litigation." In another case, Roberts wrote a dissenting opinion that suggested Congress might lack the power under the Constitution's Commerce Clause to regulate the treatment of a certain species of wildlife.

-- Charles Lane
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. "Eating French Fries on a
metro train"..Bad "12 year old!"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. He looks like a nice enough guy.. but his eyes are a little .. freaky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jfalchion Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. John G. Roberts, 50
IF confirmed, this putz will be around for 30+ yrs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlakeB Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. THAT LITTLE GIRL HAD IT COMING!
She was eating French Fries on an American train. The judge was just doing his job in showing that American hating, satanic liberalist nonsense will not be tolerated in these United States of America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodleydem Donating Member (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. LOL. But as a former DC resident, the Metro Police does forcefully
enforce the "no eating or drinking" regulations. A woman once got arrested for eating a candy bar on the train. That's why the Metro trains and platforms are so much cleaner than other major city public transportation systems. There are very large signs everywhere that says 'ABSOLUTELY NO FOOD OR DRINK AT ANY TIME.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlakeB Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yeah, I've ridden the DC Metro train before...
and it is very tidey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sundancekid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. link no workee -- please help
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Try these--altho it may not work for long. You must be registered at WaPo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC