|
Edited on Thu Jul-21-05 07:51 AM by Armstead
Remember how the Democrats were going to be all "reasonable" and nice and "bi-partisan" after 2000, and allowed so many Bush right wing nominees go through unopposed?
Well, it's come back to haunt them, with the nominatiion of Roberts.
A core line in the GOP spin now is how Roberts had such "bi-partisan" suppoert from Democrats for his earlier confirmation to the bench. Only three Democrats on the Judicial committee voted "No." That proves that even Democrats agreed that Roberts is highly qualified to be on the Supreme Court, according to the GOP line.
See? Democrats tried to be reasonable and cooperative and docile, hoping it would defang the GOP. Instead, the GOP is now using the Democrats docility and passivity and "picking our battles" strategy against our side.
This is a perfect example of how the GOP spin places Democrats in a "damned if you do and damned if you don"t position. When Democrats cooperate, the GOP says it proves that radical conservatives are "mainstream."
Same thing with the Iraq War. The Democrats who openly opposed and challenged the war are now on firm footing to represent the side of that debate which is becoming more and more accepted by the majority of Americans. They can clearly say "We told you so." But those Democrats who went along with Bush have a hard time being honest opponents of it now.
Seems to me it's time for Democrats stop playing into the hands of Republicans and Bush so much. "Picking battles" and "go along to get along" doesn't work. All is does is hand the other side the club they will use to hit you over the head with.
|