The question to ask Roberts

[zipplewrath]

So you made it plain before that you have had to represent positions of your clients that you didn't necessarily share. When you worked on the legal team for the President during the 2000 recount litigation, did you share the position the president and his legal team took? Did you personally agree with the Supreme Court even hearing the case? Did you agree with the reasoning the Court used to take the actions they took?

[mandomom]

1. And what was legally the correct position for the Florida legislature

to take had Gore been declared the winner there?

[emulatorloo]

2. Will you recuse yourself from cases involving Bush Admin officials?

Did you agree w yr client Operation Rescue in thier tactics to harass and intimidate women seeking medical care?

[leveymg]

3. Bingo - Get the Word Out! Also - No Appn't til Rove/Libby Jailed

No S. Ct. Appn't til Rove/Libby Trial is Over
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/7/21/8592/09468
Thu Jul 21st, 2005 at 05:59:02 PDT
Karl - If you're reading this: No SCOTUS confirmation until you're in jail with Libby. Here's the deal, and the only one your boss is going to get on the Roberts nomination:


Bush appointees must recuse themselves from cases involving Bush Admin. officials - there is a clear conflict of interest here.


all SCOTUS appointments wait until the Plamegate prosecutions are completed - nobody would have let Richard Nixon appoint a Supreme Court Justice after the Watergate investigation began. This is more serious than Watergate.


That is all - The Real Deal Democrats. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4154846