Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If you assume Roberts is replacement for Rehnquist....?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 02:37 PM
Original message
If you assume Roberts is replacement for Rehnquist....?
Would that be a fair trade? Or will Roberts be worse than Rehnquist? Of course, we know that Rehnquist didn't resign but O'Connor did...Does that mean the next nominee will have to be a replacement for O'Connor? Also, a woman? And if we can get a moderate woman in that next nomination, where would you see the court? More or less conservative than at present? Of course, that would mean the next nominee would be a fight to the death if Roberts is confirmed this time. Just a little look down the road....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Roberts is a replacement for
O'Connor though...which leads to some major concerns as to who would be replacing Rehnquist when he goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't see where you're coming from at all...
Why would Bush replace a conservative with a moderate when he has just replaced a moderate with a conservative?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. AND he's not going to make someone with little experience
on the bench a Chief Justice. Just not gonna happen. Scalia, I would imagine, might get CJ, and we'll just be dealing with Scalia's replacement as another SC judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I would bet Thomas gets elevated to CJ
For one, to stick it to the Democrats for his 1991 confirmation hearing fiasco, and two, he is much younger than Scalia and Bush is looking for a legacy.

I would place my bet on either Luttig, Edith Jones, or Janice Rogers Brown replacing Rehquist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Done a lot of searching
Even though it seems Roberts is to the right of O'Connor, he isn't up to the standard of a Scalia. I think Bush is saving the Scalia type judge for Rhenquist's death/retirement. Somebody even to the right of Rhenquist. He may be waiting to appoint a FEMALE Scalia (Jones/Brown/Owens?) type for when Rhenquist dies/retires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. The one that will replace Rehnquist will froth at the mouth...
this one is supposed to look clean and harmless...
the next one can froth at the mouth.

Filibusters are in the Constitution for a reason.
In treasonous times, everything in the toolbox
should be used. Come on Mr. Byrd. Take out your
little black book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Filibusters aren't in the Constitution
but they are in the Senate rules for a reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. oops, thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC