Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Vs. Gore is the Litmus Test--NY Daily New oped/Zion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 03:12 PM
Original message
Bush Vs. Gore is the Litmus Test--NY Daily New oped/Zion
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ideas_opinions/story/330083p-282082c.html

New York Daily News

Bush vs. Gore is the litmus test
Sidney Zion

Don't bother John Roberts about Roe vs. Wade. Make him tell us what he thinks about Bush vs. Gore.

That's the key question, and the answer will advise the Senate and the country as to his bona fides, advertised as a jurist who will read the Constitution as written and never legislate from the bench.

It should interest both sides of the Senate, and conservatives and liberals everywhere. In a pure sense, conservatives more, for they have promoted judicial self-restraint and states' rights forever.

And what decision in our history was more contemptuous of both than Bush vs. Gore? That 5-to-4 ruling, which ran against everything the Rehnquist Five stood for, put George W. Bush in the White House. It was nothing less than a judicial coup d'état, and it embarrassed principled conservatives as it outraged liberals.

Al Gore might have been President if the court had ordered a statewide recount of all the ballots that had been rejected, a total of 175,010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. And what's worse, the opinion declaring itself to not be precedent.
Everyone once in a while, a ruling is confined to its facts by later decisions...usually some Rehnquist fuckup.....as a nice way to overturn without saying so.

But for a decision to declare that it has no legal effect beyond the case is to admit that it isn't decided on any principles of law whatsoever.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes Yes Yes
:kick: and nominated. Rub their noses in their "judicial activism" and "states rights" bullcrap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Talismom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. Excellent suggestion! Right on! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. that was a terrible decision
and well worth discussing in the hearings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kliljedahl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Funny the Bushco drones never mention this
when they complain about "activist judges." I usually shut them right up when I mention it. They still have no response to it.


Keith’s Barbeque Central
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. The democrats need to keep bringing this up
Can you imagine if that went the other way?
I can't - we've moved so far into a different direction since then:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elcondor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Such a good point ... hopefully it
will come up! Nominated, thanks for posting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'd certainly like to know his answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC