Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John G. Roberts Jr. SCOTUS nomination political payback....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 04:46 AM
Original message
John G. Roberts Jr. SCOTUS nomination political payback....
....for shadow legal maneuvering that got GWB the presidency in 2000.

<snip>
July 21, 2005 latimes.com
: National Politics - BUSH'S SUPREME COURT NOMINEE
Confirmation Path May Run Through Florida
Roberts' low-profile role as an advisor to Republicans during the 2000 presidential recount fight is likely to be closely scrutinized.

By Peter Wallsten, Times Staff Writer


WASHINGTON — As the 2000 presidential recount battle raged in Florida, a Washington lawyer named John G. Roberts Jr. traveled to Tallahassee, the state capital, to dispense legal advice.

He operated in the shadows at least some of those 37 days, never signing a legal brief and rarely making an appearance at the makeshift headquarters for George W. Bush's legal team.

But now Roberts has been selected for the very Supreme Court that put Bush into office by settling the recount, chosen by the president to replace the swing vote in that 5-4 decision. And his work in Florida during that time is coming into focus, giving critics some ammunition to paint a respected jurist with an apparently unblemished legal career as an ideological partisan.

Republican lawyers who worked on the recount said Wednesday that Roberts advised Gov. Jeb Bush on the role that the governor and the Florida Legislature might play in the recount battle. At the time, when GOP officials feared that Democrat Al Gore might win a recount battle in court, Republican state lawmakers were devising a plan to use their constitutional power to assign the state's electoral votes to George W. Bush — a proposal criticized by Democrats.

<more>
<link> http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/la-na-recount21jul21,1,6214792.story?coll=la-news-politics-national&ctrack=1&cset=true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. He is a made man in the BFEE.
And when he gets on the court he will know what is expected of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. So he helped Jeb figure out how NOT TO COUNT THE VOTES
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 06:40 AM by DoYouEverWonder
Do we want someone who may ended up with a life appoint to the Supreme Court, who doesn't believe in counting every vote?

A few other problems that this story exposes:

First Jeb had recused himself at the start of the contest phase of the election. Why would he be getting legal advice from anyone about how to find a way to get his brother selected?

Second, since Roberts did this 'at his own expenses' wouldn't his advise and expenses be considered a campaign contribution? Shouldn't there be a record of this somewhere? What if his services weren't reported? Would that mean he violated election/campaign laws?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC