http://www.needlenose.com/node/view/1668which says, after pointing out that a recent Washington Post article concerning the memo has an apparent abundance of sources:
This is an angle I've been interested in from the outset of the controversy, from the Bushites' barely concealed war with the CIA to the apparent mole on the White House staff (who could be chief of staff Andrew Card) to the antipathy of Colin Powell and his allies, who appear to be the sources behind the State Department memo stories.
In particular, the Powell loyalists seem to be very savvy about pushing their side of the story piece by piece, in order to encourage maximum media attention. This particular paragraph in the Post article reads like a knife in the back:
Almost all of the memo is devoted to describing why State Department intelligence experts did not believe claims that Saddam Hussein had in the recent past sought to purchase uranium from Niger. Only two sentences in the seven-sentence paragraph mention Wilson's wife.
Why didn't this additional issue -- raising the stakes to involve the entire WMD lie campaign -- come out in the several earlier news stories about the memo? Because the sources leaking it wanted to hold it in reserve.
It seems that Plamemania is steadily morphing from a war between the CIA and Dick Cheney's office to one between the Rove/Cheney axis and everyone they've ever pissed off. Which, as we're finding out, is a rather long list of people with a lot of hidden daggers.