Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Great news! FL federal judge rules DRE machines aren't required by fall!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 07:57 AM
Original message
Great news! FL federal judge rules DRE machines aren't required by fall!
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 08:17 AM by flpoljunkie
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/volusia/orl-locvvote22072205jul22,0,3863451,print.story?coll=orl-news-headlines-volusia

Touch-screen machines aren't required in fall elections, he says

By Kevin P. Connolly
Sentinel Staff Writer

July 22, 2005

DELAND -- In a victory for Volusia County and foes of paperless voting, a federal judge Thursday denied blind advocates' demand for disability-accessible, touch-screen voting devices in Volusia for the Oct. 11 city elections.

U.S. District Judge John Antoon II said previous court cases and existing federal law do not require equipment for visually disabled people to vote independently.

Antoon also shot down arguments from attorneys for the National Federation of the Blind and others suing Volusia County that a state law requires accessible voting devices for elections after July 1.

He noted that accessibility requirements under the federal Help America Vote Act take effect Jan. 1, and federal grants to help pay for accessible devices must be returned if they are not spent by that date.

But the state law merely authorizes the use of electronic voting devices and provides standards for certifying such equipment, Antoon said in his six-page ruling.

The state law "simply has no bearing," he wrote in his order denying the NFB's request for a preliminary injunction to force the county to purchase touch-screens. The devices allow the visually disabled to vote without assistance because they have "audio ballots" and headphones.

more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ruling being appealed to the 11th Circuit in Atlanta. Florida DOE unhappy
with the ruling, of course.

You have to ask yourself why the Republican machine is working hand in glove with the National Federation of the Blind to bring the visually impaired and us machines that are easy to use but produce election results which cannot be verified--that is, cannot be recounted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneold1-4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ballots in Braille
Surely this is a forerunner of button-no-paper machines and should be done by mail with 30 days, and recoverable ballot through blind organizations when necessary.
This same program should be available to the deaf as well as the blind because the deaf far outnumber blind!
The Lions International Org. and AARP Would be a good source of help with this plan.
It is already a fact that mail ballots are proved to be the the easiest, most cost efficient, personal, record-able, way to vote for all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. LTTE reports that Diebold was the sponsor of the NFB Florida conference!
http://www.news-journalonline.com/03LettersIndex.htm

County Council's choice supported

Re "Will fight for private vote," July 18 letter:

In her letter excoriating the Volusia County Council for rejecting the purchase of Diebold touch-screen voting machines and The News-Journal for supporting that decision, Kathy Davis failed to inform the public that she is president of the National Federation of the Blind of Florida, the organization suing the County Council, and that, according to its Web site (www.nfbflorida.org), the 2005 convention of this organization is being sponsored by Diebold Election Systems.

Ms. Davis claims "nothing is wrong" with the Diebold touch-screen machines. To the contrary, there is a great deal wrong with these machines. She says a recount can be done by producing copies of the votes with a printer. But printers simply repeat what is recorded (or programmed to be recorded) in the machine, and voters have no assurance that their votes are recorded correctly. Moreover, these machines, like any computer, are subject to electronic failure, and when that happens votes are irretrievably lost and cannot be reproduced for a recount. The printer module proposed in the Diebold contract with the county has not been certified by the state and therefore could not be legally purchased by Volusia County.

Disabled persons are not being treated like "second-class citizens" as Ms. Davis claims. The Volusia County Council fully intends to have verifiable voting machines accessible not only to the blind but to persons of other disabilities in place by Jan. 1, the federal deadline for compliance with the Help America Vote Act (HAVA). It is the state of Florida, not the County Council, that is putting Volusia's compliance in jeopardy by dragging its feet in certifying the AutoMARK, an alternative voting system for the disabled that uses a paper ballot and is accessible to all disabled persons. This is the system the County Council originally contracted to buy and still wants to buy when it is certified by the state.

SYLVIA PERKINS, DeLand
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC