Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Salon's Joe Conason: "Pundits on Plame: Clueless and Conscienceless"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 10:28 AM
Original message
Salon's Joe Conason: "Pundits on Plame: Clueless and Conscienceless"
http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2005/07/23/plame/print.html

Pundits on Plame: Clueless and conscienceless

Loyal GOP mouthpieces insisted Valerie Plame had a desk job. Now that we know she was a covert CIA operative, will they apologize? Of course not.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Joe Conason

July 23, 2005  |  Under intense political pressure, once scarce information about the CIA leak prosecution is suddenly emerging from "persons familiar with the case." Should those whispers prove accurate, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl "Turd Blossom" Rove and vice-presidential Chief of Staff Lewis "Scooter" Libby may yet be held accountable for whatever roles they actually played in the exposure of Valerie Wilson's CIA identity -- and in the coverup of that potential crime.

Accountability will never extend, however, to their eager accessories: the pundits who assisted the coverup by persistently spreading disinformation about Valerie Wilson.

Unlike officials who lie to the FBI or the grand jury, those writers cannot be legally penalized for their deceptions, let alone their imbecilities. But they deserve at the very least to be noted and remembered, especially now that one of their favorite falsehoods -- the claim that Wilson's identity wasn't secret -- has been decisively disproved.

On Thursday, the Washington Post published the most important new fact of the Wilson case on Page 1. Quoting current and former government officials, the Post reported that "a classified State Department memorandum central to a federal leak investigation contained information about CIA officer Valerie Plame in a paragraph marked '(S)' for secret, a clear indication that any Bush administration official who read it should have been aware the information was classified, according to current and former government officials."

That June 10, 2003, memorandum, prepared by a State Department intelligence official, was previously reported by the New York Times to have been circulated among top Bush administration officials in their quest for information about Wilson's husband, former ambassador and administration critic Joseph Wilson. According to Post reporters Walter Pincus and Jim VandeHei, the memo mentions Valerie Wilson, by her married name, in its second paragraph. They quote two sources saying that the document "was clearly marked" to warn readers that the information about her was classified "secret." The Post story also notes that the CIA classifies the names of its covert officers as "secret."

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. and arrogance-like their boss: "I'm the commander. See, I don't have ..."


"I'm the commander. See, I don't have to explain why I say things. That's the interesting thing about being the president. Maybe somebody needs to explain to me why they say something, but I don't feel like I owe anybody an explanation."
- G W Bush, during an interview with Bob Woodward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Maybe this quote can be used at
his trial.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. Any know the date Wilson and Plame were married?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. Conscienceless yes! Clueless, no!
They knew exactly what they were doing. As usual, Joe is right on the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. you summed it all up right there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Great piece, I just read it...
and he really did call Rove "Turd Blossom" in it. Bwahahaha... just gotta love ya' Joe! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC