Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

At least the British ADMIT shooting the wrong man 5 times is a "tragedy"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 03:16 PM
Original message
At least the British ADMIT shooting the wrong man 5 times is a "tragedy"
IMAGINE if it happened here. IMAGINE Bush's photo op.

"We shot him in the head five times because the terrorists hate us for our freedoms. But freedom is on the march, and we have firm resolve. We will not be shaken. Shooting this poor innocent motherf**ker in the head five times for no good reason is PROOF that we must stay in Eye-Rack, because if we don't fight the terrorists on their soil, we will fight them in our own backyard. Be afraid. Thank you, and good night."



http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050723/ts_nm/security_britain_dc

LONDON (Reuters) - Police admitted on Saturday they had shot dead the wrong man in a tragic error as they combed London for four men after attempted bomb attacks on the capital's transport system.

Plainclothes police chased the man onto an underground train on Friday after he ignored warnings to stop, shooting him five times in the head because they feared he was carrying a bomb and was going to detonate it.

"We are now satisfied that he was not connected with the incidents of Thursday 21st July 2005," police said on Saturday.

"For somebody to lose their life in such circumstances is a tragedy and one that the Metropolitan Police Service regrets."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Benbow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, and we do body counts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. If it happened here
we would at least have contradictory stories put out to place doubt; he reached for his pocket, thought he had a gun, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newswolf56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. If it happened here, at least 100 rounds would have been fired...
the cops' five hits would have been distributed throughout the man's body (arms, legs etc.), and there's a high possibility bystanders would have been shot too. American police marksmanship is infamously bad -- not the cops fault: squeamish or anti-gun administrators refuse to allocate adequate quantities of practice ammunition. At least the British cops are well enough trained and practiced to hit what they shoot at. (Hitting a target the size of a human head moving at the speed of a running suspect is especially difficult with a handgun.) Our own cops can't shoot even a quarter as well.

That said, it is always a tragedy when an an innocent dies in a police or military operation -- but why did the man run?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Panda1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here, they'd deny it first
Then they'd assign blame elsewhere. The MSM would make it stick. When proven to be lying, they'd refuse to comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC