SF Gate (San Francisco Chronicle) readers reply to that question. (NOTE: Go to the link...there are two more responses. None of them were "pro-Bush/Rove").
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/07/24/ING6RDRS3H1.DTL1. Carolyn Mack, Santa Rosa
Not if he actually made the leak. That would mean he acted against his friend -- and his president -- and therefore deserves no loyalty..
2. Mark Freeman, San Francisco
He sure should. If Rove is stripped of security clearance for putting our spy's life at risk as political payback, who would do George's thinking for him? Yikes!.
3. Ruben Medina, Hayward
He is being loyal to Karl Rove. He has made it easier to retain him by altering his standard for firing. That's as good as absolving him of any wrongdoing. How about some loyalty to fairness and justice? How about some loyalty to the American people?.
4. Lisa Jervis, Oakland
I don't think it's a question of loyalty. I think Bush's and Scott McClellan's defense of Rove are yet more attempts to evade the consequences of the administration's mistakes. But on the question of loyalty, shouldn't covert operatives expect loyalty from those high up in the government that employs them?
---------
Two Cents is a pool of Bay Area residents we tap for comments and anecdotes. Columns are a representative sampling of responses to questions we pose via e-mail. To join the pool, e-mail us at twocents@9sfchronicle.com.