Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain's appalling reason for withholding Robert’s Solicitor General docs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:46 PM
Original message
McCain's appalling reason for withholding Robert’s Solicitor General docs
Edited on Sun Jul-24-05 12:55 PM by pat_k
On This Week, McCain argued for withholding material Roberts generated in his work at the Office of the Solicitor General.

Unfortunately, the transcript is not available, but it went something like this:

…When he was working for the Solicitor General's Office -- working for the President -- the President of the United States was his client. Releasing the documents would be a violation of attorney client privilege…


I find this reasoning appalling.

The mission of the Office of the Solicitor General is to represent the interests of the United States before the Supreme Court.
--Organization, Mission and Functions Manual, September 2004


The Solicitor General represents the United States – that means the whole kit and caboodle. The United States is not the same as the President of the United States. The Bush regime may regard the Solicitor General as their own personal attorney, but doing so is an abuse of the office.

I have little doubt that McCain got this "talking point" from some minion of the Bush Regime. Whatever its source, it's just another example of their adherence to an autocratic, not democratic, system of government. They apparently feel so secure that they aren't even bothering to pretend they believe in "We the People."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like McCain also likes consolidation of power in the executive
Since he wants to run for the presidency, I guess he needs to curry the favor of the right and would enjoy such executive power if he won the nomination and election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. McCain is showing more and more everyday that he only go elected
to public office out of sympathy for being a POW.

It sure as hell isn't his smarts, honesty, or integrity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carnie_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. He lost
any respect I had for him when he got all huggy with * on the campaign trail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Exactly ! He was not representing the president of the US....
He was representing the people of the United States. The President was not his "client". where does this shit come from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. The client can waive the attorney-client privilege
and it should in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. There is no privilege here. NONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Interesting
and good catch. It doesn't appear that that objection could stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Agreed - and it seems that McCain can rationalize anything these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. it doesn't matter because leahy straightened that out
on the next show and stephanopolis (i think) showed both clips on his show. leahy made it very clear that the solicitor general works for the american people . . . NOT the president.

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. The argument is bogus. In both the Nixon Watergate hearings and the
Clinton/Lewinsky bruhaha, the courts rules that the lawyers who worked for the White House were government employees, and no attorney/client privilege existed between the President and the lawyer. The same would be true of the Solicitor General, I would assume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. release them papers...

..........should be no problem releasing the documents. It's obvious that Bush is hiding something from the people.


This is a LIFETIME appointment. It's our duty to know more about Roberts.


Reminds one of the energy papers involving cheney..the SC sided with cheney........hummmmm................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democratic veteran Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Twenty questions is twenty minutes for twenty years.
That's all the Democrats will get, twenty minutes each for a guy that will be on the bench for twenty years. Who cares if he helped JEB screw the people of Florida out of their vote. These guys only car for their own kind of Americans, not all Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Twenty years? A healthy white male of 50 today can expect to live
to be over 80. Hell, my alcoholic, drug-abusing dad lived to be almost 70, and he never went to a doctor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. McCain has lost all integrity, all honor, all semblance of reasoning.
He's a loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Will McCain fool all the people all the time with his
total BS? He is a pathetic phony and a RW lapdog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garthranzz Donating Member (983 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. The scariest part of all this...
If someone who could resist torture by the Vietnamese for six years caves into the pressure/torture (can you say Abu Gitmo?) of ShrubRoveCheney, we are truly entering the era of Big Brother. McCain used to be a man of integrity, someone you could respect even if you disagreed with him. He's clearly pandering to the Republican "right" now, hoping for a presidential nomination he'll never get. G-d only knows what they did to make him step in line.

Does anyone else see an unraveling as power consolidates? Nixon, the pursuit of Clinton, Bush - seems rather cosmologic by analogy - as the black hole pulls all matter to it, everything not caught in the vortex is flung outward, explosively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. McCain, dork always a dork - don't ever trust him
I really don't know why so many people trust McCain. He's such a turkey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Athame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. I thought the reason ** and the veep had to lawyer up
with the grand jury investigation was that neither the White House counsel nor the Solicitor General have attorney-client privelege with the White House.

McCain is just spitting chaff to draw fire away from Roberts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wickerwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
19. Looks like McCain isn't a big "West Wing" fan.
Even I know that the Solicitor General isn't the President's private counsel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
20. Ken Starr Destroyed That Privilege,
or at least tried to, during the Whitewater investigation. He argued that Clinton's conversations with his lawyers were not privileged simply because the lawyers were being paid by the government.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
21. Obviously they have something to hide or need time to 'correct' the record
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
22. I just called his office and told his aide to tell McCain to stop lying...
Edited on Mon Jul-25-05 10:03 AM by ClarkUSA
to the American people. I explained McCain's specious reasoning regarding attorney-client privileges and asked that someone in his DC office correct him before he continues to cover for an obviously anti-choice candidate who has something to hide from the public as well as the Democratic Senators asking for his documents when he worked for the Office of Solicitor General whose client is the United States not the President. I said that it's obvious McCain is kissing Bush's butt so he can run in 2008, but that to alot of folks, McCain is an apologist for the Bush administration for everything from Rovegate to Roberts.

I said that Senator Leahy (who corrected McCain's false comments yesterday on This Week) as well as liberal blogs know the truth and that McCain had better stop speaking with a forked Republican tongue or else the next time he lies about this, his offices will be getting 10,000 phone calls correcting him.

His aide told me that he'd tell Senator McCain. Whatever.

DC Phone: (202) 224-2235
Press #2 to speak to an aide immediately.

McCain likes to bill himself as a straight-talker, but so does Bill O'Reilly. They are both lying hypocrites who deserve to be exposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
23. John McCain is nothing but a fi' dollah 'ho...and I'll bet he calls Shrub
"Big Daddy".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
24. Ooops, the Patriot Act doesn't include this?
It just struck me funny that in Bush's Terror World, there are some loopholes in the privacy issues still intact :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC