What happens if Bush gives up Rove

[jamesinca]

If Bush dismisses Karl Rove does that mean that Bush did not do his job earlier? Does this mean that Bush should be impeached under the truth in government act? Getting rid of him 2 years after this comes out, is this something Bush can be impeached for because he drug his feet or covered up? Can we execute Bush for treason and just leave Karl alone? Oh the questions that swirl through the mind.

[DanCa]

1. Rove knows everyones skeletons

I want Rove to admit that he stole the election and how. By this time next year, after the whole administration is impeached, they would declare the 2004 election fraudalent and award it To Kerry and 2005 starts off with President Kerry. Okay i know its like a gazillion to one shot, but I can dream right.

[magnolia]

12. I'm dreaming the same dream!

Maybe this time next year our big dilemna will be which president...Gore or Kerry. Since both their elections were stolen.

[The Doctor.]

2. None of the above I'd wager...

Unless Bush becomes deeply implicated.

Rove can still run things from a cell too... and I bet it'll be a country club.

[HawkerHurricane]

3. I saw a cartoon...

Showing Bush talking to Rove, about how to preserve the people on top the people lower down might have to be sacrificed.
Rove's answer?
"I understand, but I'd miss you, George."

[ElectroPrincess]

4. It's not worth a moment to ponder ...

Ask yourself this about Bush = Has George W. Bush *ever* admitted ANY fault, from ANYone, at ANYtime during his Presidency? This is not even a possibility considering the rigid make-up of this man.

With this "clutch" the more bizarre the scenario, the better. My guess is that Karl Rove will resign within the next two months. If Fitz lets the investigation drop. Well then! = Karl Rove is next in line for that coveted "Medal of Freedom" that all true f**k-ups in this Administration are awarded. :puke:

[kster]

5. I think that may be

part of the plan, Rove story, fire Rove to take the heat off DSM.

Just a thought.

[autorank]

6. What makes you think Bush won't be indicted. He has a criminal attorney

That means that there is the possibility of being indicted. Maybe he'll be a "person of interest" -- a little gift a prosecutor gives a guilty party he/she can't indict becasue the evidence isn't there.

I think you're on the right track.

[Che_Nuevara]

7. I really think that they believe they can beat this thing

Rove knows the dirt on the entire WH. Rove admitting that he was responsible for the Plame leak would require an explanation as to why he did it ... and Rove isn't about to admit that he did it to cover up the fact that our Vice President profits from illegal weapon trafficking. Unless the federal prosecutor can get Rove convicted, nothing will ever come of this.

[kster]

8. Well jeeeeze

I hope your wrong.

[jamesinca]

9. I think he is correct

I really have a hard time believing that all this happened on accident and George Bush was sent by god. I believe they all have black evil hearts and it would not surprise me if this is what is happening. But I will let them have their day in court none the less.

[Disturbed]

10. Rove will not be fired unless he is convicted.

Rove will not resign. Shrub wouldn't allow it.The GJ would still continue even if Rove did resign because he will still be charged if the GJ finds that he comitted criminal acts. There are others that will prolly be indicted, as well.

[SoCalifer]

11. I think its too late..

I think that no matter what, Rove is going to damage the Repukes severely.

I also think that the way they see it; the least damaging route to take is to fight it tooth and nail and make themselves look like the victims of mean and nasty trouble making Democrats.

The gravity of this WHOLE situation is soooooo bad for the Repuke party, that it makes Watergate look like a j-walking ticket. So the only thing I think they can do is to fight it tooth and nail and act like they are the victims.