Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Eloquent statement by Judge Coughenou at sentencing of Ressam

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:39 PM
Original message
Eloquent statement by Judge Coughenou at sentencing of Ressam
First of U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenou regarding the sentencing of Ahmed Ressam, convicted of plotting to bomb the Los Angeles airport.

“First, that we have the resolve in this country to deal with the subject of terrorism and people who engage in it should be prepared to sacrifice a major portion of their life in confinement.

"Secondly, though, I would like to convey the message that our system works. We did not need to use a secret military tribunal, or detain the defendant indefinitely as an enemy combatant, or deny him the right to counsel, or invoke any proceedings beyond those guaranteed by or contrary to the United States Constitution.


"I would suggest that the message to the world from today's sentencing is that our courts have not abandoned our commitment to the ideals that set our nation apart. We can deal with the threats to our national security without denying the accused fundamental constitutional protections.

"Despite the fact that Mr. Ressam is not an American citizen and despite the fact that he entered this country intent upon killing American citizens, he received an effective, vigorous defense, and the opportunity to have his guilt or innocence determined by a jury of 12 ordinary citizens.

"Most importantly, all of this occurred in the sunlight of a public trial. There were no secret proceedings, no indefinite detention, no denial of counsel.

http://www.king5.com/cgi-bin/bi/gold_print.cgi

I quote from a news report, but I believe the words of the judge are public property and may be freely cited, so I cited slightly more than the allowed four paragraphs. The Judge's additional words are well worth reading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Way to go Your Honor!
:applause: :applause: :applause:
:patriot: :patriot: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. So how come HE wasn't nominated for the USSC?
nevermind, I think I know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanacowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. AND A BIG SMACK DOWN TO THE BFEE
right on Judge - you tell it like it is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Very nice.
I wonder how many other judges are seething at what is happening to our Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Many. Many. Rest assured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. kick so more people will nominate this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC