Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I thought Roberts "had no paper trail"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
carrowsboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 06:13 PM
Original message
I thought Roberts "had no paper trail"
Then how is this dingleberry so sure of his letter?

http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=14939661&BRD=2271&PAG=461&dept_id=462943&rfi=6

"Roberts will interpret the Constitution instead of legislating from the bench

To the editor:

Judge Roberts is an excellent choice for the Supreme Court of the United States.  He is committed to interpreting the law rather than making new law from the bench.  
I believe he will faithfully apply the United States Constitution and not the legal opinion of other nations when forming his opinions. He should be given an up or down vote and not filibustered.  
Our nation needs more judges like Judge Roberts

Sincerely,
Keith Rathbone
Montpelier

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Somebody needs to do a cartoon...
Roberts leaving the restroom trailing TP from his backside...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemInDistress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. This past tuesday night on jay leno
Bill Maher suggested roberts during the night,Anally Raped his wife then roberts claimed he had the wrong hole.Was it a joke? Is there any substance to the wife's claim? let me know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3waygeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Maher's a bit confused...
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 06:25 PM by 3waygeek
there was a similar story several months ago about a Bush FDA appointee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Maher isn't the one who is confused, it is the original poster who is
confused. Maher stated the FDA appointee, and even made note of his position and 'expertise' in FDA. He stopped RU486.

..and yes it is true, anal rape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Different guy
The story is true about that guy though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
90-percent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Roberts
He's definately a uniter, not a divider.



-85%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Nope - not Roberts. that was Dr. W. David Hagar
The anal rape charge was made by his wife and was intheir divorce papers. Here's a site for you that details the story and many others of Republican hypocrisy:
http://www.coldtype.net/Assets.05/Niman/Niman.13.05.pdf



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemInDistress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. thank you
I stand corrected..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. YOU'RE the one who's wrong; Maher correctly attributed this
It had nothing to do with Roberts. Please get your information straight. The point of the joke was that Hagar was a gynecologist, yet was claiming that he accidentally boffed the wrong hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemInDistress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Purity..
Yes,I stand corrected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Not Roberts at all. Watch Maher again. I can't remember
his name, but a blivet appointee (he's a gynecologist).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemInDistress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. babylon..
I have been corrected..ty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. No paper trail that YOU'RE allowed to see
But oddly enough, all the volks in the Amen Corner have come out to tell us what a swell guy Roberts is, and how there's no one in America more qualified to be a Supreme Court Jester--I mean, Justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. As My Father Used To Say To Me When I Made A Stupid Remark...
That's what YOU get for THINKING!!!

If he was here today, he would DIE! Unfortunately, that already happened and I miss him so much! My political mentor when I was 12!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC