Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bolton vs. Holbrooke: A tale of 2 UN Ambassador nominations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AirAmFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 04:23 PM
Original message
Bolton vs. Holbrooke: A tale of 2 UN Ambassador nominations
We now have an extremist, untruthful, and arrogant UN Ambassodor who represents the White House but not the people of the United States. The enormity of Bush's recess appointment of this man, who well may be the original leaker of Valerie Plame's identity to the press, is historic. Did you miss this important WashingtonNote column a few days ago:

From http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/000820.html :

"A Tale of Two Nominees, by Scott Paul, July 28, 2005

It turns out John Bolton is not the first UN Ambassador nominee to consider a recess appointment: in 1999, President Clinton floated the idea of a recess appointment for Richard Holbrooke, one of his UN Ambassador nominees, but Holbrooke refused. No, Bolton has another place in the record books: he is the first nominee to actively campaign for a recess appointment. There couldn't be a starker contrast in priorities and conduct between nominees. Holbrooke had the support of an overwhelming majority of senators, but he insisted on having the full body's stamp of approval before taking the job. Bolton, on the other hand, is the most contentious UN Ambassador nominee in history. Chances are he couldn't steal 45 votes in the Senate on a secret ballot. Yet, as the White House comes out day after day with its "up-or-down vote" pleas, Bolton is actively pushing the recess appointment option.

The Holbrooke revelation came out earlier this week, thanks to Janine Zacharia and Roger Runningen, two reporters for Bloomberg. They wrote: At one point during the long stalemate, White House officials raised the prospect of a recess appointment with Holbrooke, according to two people who were involved in the matter. Holbrooke refused, saying it would diminish his credibility at UN. The recess appointment idea for Holbrooke was not public knowledge, even among most foreign policy insiders. Rather than accept the offer and weaken our hand at the UN, Holbrooke waited - for what turned out to be 14 long months. And Holbrooke, unlike Bolton, had the support of majorities in both parties.

Meanwhile, Bolton - whose nomination has been moving backwards for months - is working behind the scenes to make himself a recess appointee. Remember, Richard Holbrooke has a reputation for arrogance that even he acknowledges. Yet, Holbrooke was smart enough, and selfless enough, to understand that he could never make up for the credibility he would lose through a recess appointment. He believed firmly that accepting it would cripple the U.S. at the UN. He was right, and six years later, the rules are still the same. If only we could count on Bolton to follow Holbrooke's example of grace and humility."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. This will be perfect:
if Bolton is now indicted by the Grand Jury. Enough egg would be on Dubya's face that the yolk will be on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Proving that this duplicitous, power grabbing admin is NOT biz as usual
What a great story. Just think, if Kerry had won, Holbrooke would probably be secretary of state now. A class act, competent, calm, respected for something more than having his tongue firmly up the president's asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AirAmFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Dubya's announcement speech today: "He will speak for ME..." Did you
notice? Not for the people of the US. Dubya has redefined statesmanship and diplomacy just the way he's redefined national defense. What childish arrogance and dangerous ignorance!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. See, Bush thinks that's all the legitimacy a guy needs
Edited on Mon Aug-01-05 07:00 PM by Inland
That he's Bush's man. He has Bush's ear. He is Bush's vicar. He channels Bush's desire. He will never, ever, ever, do one single solitary thing except the wish of Bush.

Too bad a democracy requires something more than the grace of teh sovereign GodKing for authority. Diplomacy means something more than transmitting Bush's demands.

At least, it used to. Protofacism marches on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AirAmFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Of 24 previous nominees before Bolton, 22 were confirmed UNANIMOUSLY
by the Senate, according to George Stephanopoulos on the ABC Evening News this evening (Monday).

That statistic has to be added to the quantitative record that shows just how extreme the current regime is. Their philosophy seems to be, "Legitimacy be DAMNED! We'll do whatever we think we can get away with."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC