Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OH-02: Real-time election results. Bookmark these links!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:30 PM
Original message
OH-02: Real-time election results. Bookmark these links!
Edited on Mon Aug-01-05 09:30 PM by jim3775
These are links to the real-time results pages of the 2nd district's boards of elections. There are seven counties in the 2nd district but these are the only ones that have websites, the others are too small and rural.

Brown County(35 precincts)
Currently showing primary results, hopefully will change to general election results tomorrow.
Link

Clermont County(191 Precincts)


Hamilton County(319? precincts)
This is a link to a self-updating PDF file.
http://www.hamilton-co.org/boe/inputdata/Electionsresults/Realtime/RealTime.pdf

Warren County(79 precincts)
Also showing primary results.
Link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks. What time do polls close?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'm not sure about the rest of them but Clermont county's close at 7:30.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
39. Polls close at 7:30
Anyone in line at that time can still vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Vet Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks, Should be intresting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Worthy of a nomination and keep this kicked to the top.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks Jim. I'll be hitting these suckers tomorrow night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Do people in Ohio really want.......
this person representing them? :wow: :wow: :wow:



Good luck Major Paul Hackett!

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Ugly that is only skin deep is one thing....
It's the stuff that comes out of her mouth.

I mean if Ann Coulter would just SHUT UP, she is moderately attractive. But you know THAT AIN'T gonna happen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #13
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. What can I say but.............
"It puts the lotion on it's skin or else it gets the hose again!" :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddha8 Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
34. vote control
Please someone enlighten me. If they controled the vote count in Ohio in 04' and defrauded the entire electoral process why on earth will they not do this again. Rove could run a turd with a toupee in that slot and it would win by 10% and worse yet, CNN would make it official and the American public would beleive it. We live in an Oz nightmare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adolfo Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #34
57. Praying for a clean result
Edited on Tue Aug-02-05 01:54 PM by adolfo
This time they are being watched closely by the public and could possibly be under investigation by other organizations.

(fingers crossed)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #57
71. We said that about 2004. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. "How 'bout a little fire, scarecrow, (cackling)" NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeanQuinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. She's the Wicked Witch Wishing [to represent] Warren nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirrera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
156. Excellent...ha...n/t
Edited on Tue Aug-02-05 10:19 PM by mirrera
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. shamlessly replying so I can find these links tomorrow
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyepaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. Yeah, I'm doing that too.
(so I can finde them tomorrow, that is!) :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
58. Good idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
don954 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
87. bookmarking for me too... ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kick.
:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kick!! ( Go Hackett!!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. please keep this kicked tomorrow!
Good luck Hackett!

I'm as excited about this election as I would be if it was in my own state. This election means alot to the grassroots movement!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bejammin075 Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. Watch out for level 10 terra alerts!
With Warren county, you never know. Last time, the warning was a 10 out of 10. The terrorists hated our fredom so much, it was too dangerous for the press to be near the vote counting room. But to be accomodating, the press could wait in the lobby while the vote counting was going on upstairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
12. Saved it on my desktop also... just in case hanky panky happens later
Interesting that Jean Schmidt is being dropped by rethugs like a hot potato in favor of Bob Mcewen after her disasterous interview with Paul Hackett.

PAUL HACKETT
626
762

JEAN SCHMIDT
1,418
392

BOB MCEWEN
2,210
948
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
41. Please help an ignorant Californian!
What do those numbers mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #41
162. Here is what I was thinking....
In Brown County there was a list of Reps to Congress -- one to be elected. Jean Schmidt was in one pack and Paul Hackett was in another, so I thought in addition to competing with each other they were in a Republican or DEM pack. So I thought the Republicans had other choices and that Bob McEwen was edging ahead of Jean Schmidt with people who didn't want Hackett, but didn't want her either. I could be wrong, but that is what it looks like to me.... WAIT A MINUTE THE DATES ARE WRONG?! I'm going to put in a second post and see if I can get some help here.

What I wrote:
"Interesting that Jean Schmidt is being dropped by rethugs like a hot potato in favor of Bob Mcewen after her disasterous interview with Paul Hackett."

PAUL HACKETT
626
762

JEAN SCHMIDT
1,418
392

BOB MCEWEN
2,210
948


What I saw in Brown Results:

OFFICIAL CUMULATIVE REPORT PAGE 1

25 Jun 2005 SPECIAL PRIMARY ELECTION
09:56 AM JUNE 14, 2005
BROWN COUNTY, OHIO
35 PRECINCTS

COUNT PERCENT
PRECINCTS COUNTED - COUNTY WIDE 35 100.00

REGISTERED VOTERS - DEMOCRAT 4,612

REGISTERED VOTERS - REPUBLICAN 3,763

REGISTERED VOTERS - NON-PARTISAN 20,866

REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL 29,241

BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRAT 1,217 26.39

BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN 2,287 60.78

BALLOTS CAST - NON-PARTISAN 0

BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL 3,504 11.98

REPRESENTATIVE TO CONGRESS (2ND DISTRICT) *
ONE TO BE ELECTED
STEVE AUSTIN 15 .67
TOM BEMMES 13 .58
TOM BRINKMAN, JR. 357 15.87
PAT DEWINE 402 17.87
PETER A. FOSSETT 6 .27
BOB MCEWEN 948 42.13
ERIC MINAMYER 53 2.36
DOUGLAS E. MINK 5 .22
JEFF MORGAN 51 2.27
JEAN SCHMIDT 392 17.42
DAVID R. SMITH 8 .36

REPRESENTATIVE TO CONGRESS (2ND DISTRICT) *
ONE TO BE ELECTED
PAUL HACKETT 762 63.82
JAMES JOHN PARKER 60 5.03
CHARLES W. SANDERS 135 11.31
JEFF SINNARD 31 2.60
VICTORIA WELLS WULSIN 206 17.25
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #41
163. I found a descrepency and now I am kicking myself.
If I had taken the time last night to post the copies complete in this thread, we would have these bastards, but now I don't know how to prove what I have... I mean they can look at my machine and see that I didn't alter anything, right? But if I had posted it here last night several people would have been able to verify it.

Then when I was calling Sam Seder with Air America his staff put me on hold - someone took my question and then put me on hold for the WHOLE show.... and my husband was bugging me to put together a picnic so I was trying to focus on the numbers, but I never went back and compared the date until I responded to your thread.. and this was so late because when my husband and I went to our picnic we got in a bit of a fight, so I said, "OK" to renting a DVD and I just got back to looking at what I saved. Here it is.

I saved the Brown County as Text because it was smaller here is the exact time:

Created: Yesterday, August 02, 2005, 12:46:41 AM
Modified: Yesterday, August 02, 2005, 12:46:41 AM
and Accessed: Yesterday, August 02, 2005, 12:46:41 AM
are the same - so that shows they weren't touched.

NOW Accessed just changed to: Today, August 03, 2005, 1:07:47 AM because I looked at the properties and copied the date but Modified did NOT change, because I haven't changed anything.

Here is the Brown County text:

THERE ARE TWO DATES AND NEITHER ARE CORRECT!!!!
*********************************************


OFFICIAL CUMULATIVE REPORT PAGE 1

25 Jun 2005 SPECIAL PRIMARY ELECTION
09:56 AM JUNE 14, 2005
BROWN COUNTY, OHIO
35 PRECINCTS

COUNT PERCENT
PRECINCTS COUNTED - COUNTY WIDE 35 100.00

REGISTERED VOTERS - DEMOCRAT 4,612

REGISTERED VOTERS - REPUBLICAN 3,763

REGISTERED VOTERS - NON-PARTISAN 20,866

REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL 29,241

BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRAT 1,217 26.39

BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN 2,287 60.78

BALLOTS CAST - NON-PARTISAN 0

BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL 3,504 11.98

REPRESENTATIVE TO CONGRESS (2ND DISTRICT) *
ONE TO BE ELECTED
STEVE AUSTIN 15 .67
TOM BEMMES 13 .58
TOM BRINKMAN, JR. 357 15.87
PAT DEWINE 402 17.87
PETER A. FOSSETT 6 .27
BOB MCEWEN 948 42.13
ERIC MINAMYER 53 2.36
DOUGLAS E. MINK 5 .22
JEFF MORGAN 51 2.27
JEAN SCHMIDT 392 17.42
DAVID R. SMITH 8 .36

REPRESENTATIVE TO CONGRESS (2ND DISTRICT) *
ONE TO BE ELECTED
PAUL HACKETT 762 63.82
JAMES JOHN PARKER 60 5.03
CHARLES W. SANDERS 135 11.31
JEFF SINNARD 31 2.60
VICTORIA WELLS WULSIN 206 17.25



*******************************************

I saved the web page for Clermont County to my desktop next:

The file folder shows Created: Yesterday, Aug 02,2005, 12:47:06 AM

It is "read only" type so there is no modification or access date in the properties tab.

The properties tab of the file itself shows:
Created: Yesterday, August 02, 2005, 12:47:05 AM
Modified: Yesterday, August 02, 2005, 12:47:06 AM
Accessed: Today, August 03, 2005, 12:31:19AM

So it shows that now is the first time I've gone in and looked at the file, but there were still no modifications made. The file folder was creating during the second of difference that displays.

********************************************

Current Election Results: 8/2/05 Election Find on this page:
Printable View


Special General 2005
8/2/05
07/25/05, 11:01:18 AM
0 of 191 Precincts Reporting



Representative to Congress 2nd District (Vote for: 1)
Early Voting Election Day Provisional Total Percentage
PAUL HACKETT 0 0 0 0 0.00%
JEAN SCHMIDT 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Write In Votes 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total Votes Cast 0 0 0 0 100.00%



*******************************************

Then Warren County Next:

The file folder shows Created: Yesterday, Aug 02,2005, 12:48:07 AM

It is "read only" type so there is no modification or access date in the properties tab.

The properties tab of the file itself shows:
Created: Yesterday, August 02, 2005, 12:48:07 AM
Modified: Yesterday, August 02, 2005, 12:48:07 AM
Accessed: Today, August 03, 2005, 12:47:39AM

So it shows that now is the first time I've gone in and looked at the file, but there were still no modifications made. There is not even a second of difference in created and modified because it didn't take longer than a second to create the folder and file on my desktop.

*******************************************

Site Map | Disclaimer | Directions | Contact Us | Warren County HomePage | Board of Elections HomePage
See Past Election Results


See Canvass Report


Cumulative Report



OFFICIAL CUMULATIVE REPORT PAGE 1

25 Jun 2005 PRIMARY ELECTION
09:47 AM WARREN COUNTY, OHIO
JUNE 14, 2005
79 PRECINCTS

COUNT PERCENT
PRECINCTS COUNTED - COUNTY WIDE 79 47.59

PRECINCTS COUNTED - THIS ELECTION 79 100.00

PRECINCTS COUNTED - 2ND CONGRESS 79 100.00

REGISTERED VOTERS - DEMOCRAT 4,771

REGISTERED VOTERS - NON-PARTISAN 39,057

REGISTERED VOTERS - REPUBLICAN 17,754

REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL 61,582

BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRAT 1,111 23.29

BALLOTS CAST - NON-PARTISAN 0

BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN 6,142 34.60

BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL 7,253 11.78

DEMOCRATIC REPRESENTATIVE TO CONGRESS 2ND DISTRICT
UNEXPIRED TERM
ONE TO BE ELECTED
PAUL HACKETT 626 57.80
JAMES JOHN PARKER 48 4.43
CHARLES W. SANDERS 85 7.85
JEFF SINNARD 25 2.31
VICTORIA WELLS WULSIN 299 27.61

REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE TO CONGRESS 2ND DISTRICT
UNEXPIRED TERM
ONE TO BE ELECTED
STEVE AUSTIN 21 .35
TOM BEMMES 79 1.30
TOM BRINKMAN, JR. 1,114 18.33
PAT DEWINE 784 12.90
PETER A. FOSSETT 84 1.38
BOB MCEWEN 2,210 36.36
ERIC MINAMYER 241 3.97
DOUGLAS E. MINK 9 .15
JEFF MORGAN 17 .28
JEAN SCHMIDT 1,418 23.33
DAVID R. SMITH 101 1.66



******************************








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #41
164. When I got home tonight I copied the new numbers....
for Warren and Clemont only.... I hadn't bookmarked Brown County

File folder created for Warren: Yesterday, August 02, 2005, 8:13:09 PM
(again read only) .... also I AM IN CENTRAL TIME and OHIO IS EASTERN TIME Zone.

File created: Yesterday, August 02, 2005, 8:13:08 PM
Modified: Yesterday, August 02, 2005, 8:13:09 PM
Accessed: Today, August 03, 2005, 12:21:50 AM

*********************************************

Site Map | Disclaimer | Directions | Contact Us | Warren County HomePage | Board of Elections HomePage
See Past Election Results


See Canvass Report


Cumulative Report



CUMULATIVE REPORT #4 PAGE 1

2 Aug 2005 SPECIAL CONGRESSIONAL ELECTION
08:59 PM WARREN COUNTY, OHIO
AUGUST 2, 2005
98 PRECINCTS

COUNT PERCENT
PRECINCTS COUNTED - COUNTY WIDE 82 49.40

PRECINCTS COUNTED - THIS ELECTION 82 83.67

PRECINCTS COUNTED - 2ND CONGRESS 65 82.28

PRECINCTS COUNTED - FRANKLIN CSD 17 89.47

PRECINCTS COUNTED - HARLAN TFD 3 75.00

REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL 60,900

BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL 15,207 24.97

REPRESENTATIVE TO CONGRESS 2ND DISTRICT
UNEXPIRED TERM
ONE TO BE ELECTED
PAUL HACKETT DEM 4,512 42.32
JEAN SCHMIDT REP 6,150 57.68

FRANKLIN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSED TAX LEVY
AVOIDING OPERATING DEFICIT
ADDITIONAL - 9.79 MILLS - 5 YEARS
FOR THE TAX LEVY 2,432 54.87
AGAINST THE TAX LEVY 2,000 45.13

HARLAN TOWNSHIP PROPOSED TAX LEVY
FIRE LEVY - RENEWAL - 2.9 MILLS - 5 YEARS
FOR THE TAX LEVY 497 77.17
AGAINST THE TAX LEVY 147 22.83



**********************

Clermont County folder created: Yesterday, August 02, 2005, 8:34:15 PM

File Created: Yesterday, August 02, 2005, 8:14:01 PM
Modified: Yesterday, August 02, 2005, 8:34:15 PM
Accessed: Today, August 03, 2005, 12:22:24 AM and
Accessed: Today, August 03, 2005, 2:05:19 AM

Now this looks like I created the file BEFORE I created the folder, but since these are the final numbers, it's obvious that I haven't changed anything. It is the same as everyone else can see.

**********************

Current Election Results: 8/2/05 Election Find on this page:
Printable View


Special General 2005
8/2/05
08/02/05, 09:30:23 PM
100 of 191 Precincts Reporting



Representative to Congress 2nd District (Vote for: 1)
Early Voting Election Day Provisional Total Percentage
JEAN SCHMIDT 1158 6711 0 7869 56.24%
PAUL HACKETT 750 5349 0 6099 43.59%
Write In Votes 3 22 0 25 0.18%
Total Votes Cast 1911 12082 0 13993 100.00%


****************

Warren County Final


Folder created: Yesterday, August 02, 2005, 8:53:06 PM

File Created: Yesterday, August 02, 2005, 8:53:05 PM
Modified: Yesterday, August 02, 2005, 8:53:06 PM
(again, the folder is created by the process as the file is being created, so the one second is processing time)
Accessed: Yesterday, August 02, 2005, 10:14:20 PM


Site Map | Disclaimer | Directions | Contact Us | Warren County HomePage | Board of Elections HomePage
See Past Election Results


See Canvass Report


Cumulative Report



UNOFFICIAL CUMULATIVE REPORT PAGE 1

2 Aug 2005 SPECIAL CONGRESSIONAL ELECTION
09:10 PM WARREN COUNTY, OHIO
AUGUST 2, 2005
98 PRECINCTS

COUNT PERCENT
PRECINCTS COUNTED - COUNTY WIDE 98 59.04

PRECINCTS COUNTED - THIS ELECTION 98 100.00

PRECINCTS COUNTED - 2ND CONGRESS 79 100.00

PRECINCTS COUNTED - FRANKLIN CSD 19 100.00

PRECINCTS COUNTED - HARLAN TFD 4 100.00

REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL 73,878

BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL 18,320 24.80

REPRESENTATIVE TO CONGRESS 2ND DISTRICT
UNEXPIRED TERM
ONE TO BE ELECTED
PAUL HACKETT DEM 5,420 41.77
JEAN SCHMIDT REP 7,556 58.23

FRANKLIN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSED TAX LEVY
AVOIDING OPERATING DEFICIT
ADDITIONAL - 9.79 MILLS - 5 YEARS
FOR THE TAX LEVY 2,915 55.96
AGAINST THE TAX LEVY 2,294 44.04

HARLAN TOWNSHIP PROPOSED TAX LEVY
FIRE LEVY - RENEWAL - 2.9 MILLS - 5 YEARS
FOR THE TAX LEVY 674 77.29
AGAINST THE TAX LEVY 198 22.71



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #41
165. NEVER MIND!
AAaAgh! Got some advise from a person who is a night owl...

I copied those pages right at the beginning of the reporting.

The numbers in Brown County look like the primary numbers and so it's probably a case of cut and paste of those numbers by the person updating the web in a hurry.... doing it live instead of the two step process of completing it offline and then publishing it.

So since there is a logical explanation for what I saw I'm withdrawing my fear that I have some "exact proof" of FRAUD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sjr5740 Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
65. Kick on the numbers
Yes what do those numbers mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
14. Thanks for the links!
We can expect the Repug machine to use every tool at its disposal.
Those jerks are under a microscope today.

Go Hacket!!:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
15. thanks for the post, the links... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
16. Brown County is using Triad
http://66.241.236.181/

You remember them.... The company that posted "tip sheets" during the OH recount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Brown County qualifies for particular DU scrutiny in that case.
Anyone have any info for outsiders on pre-election polling in Brown?

How has Brown trended in previous campaigns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
160. They are such assholes! The VP of the company wrote me
a letter taunting me about "Isn't today the day you're supposed to boycott us?"

What a dickhead. We don't buy voting machines and we can't boycott them.

Deibold, Triad, all the voting machine companies are owned by Republican whores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
19. If they have real time results ...
Edited on Tue Aug-02-05 09:07 AM by lwfern
does that mean the tabulators are connected to the internet during voting? Is that a good thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demrock6 Donating Member (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Good question........
Who knows what they will be feeding us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. I was more wondering
what will hackers be feeding them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lizzieforkerry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. I'm pretty sure Warren County doesn't post their results
until after the the polls close. As they finish county precincts, they real time post the results- so it will be 10% in, 20% in, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lizzieforkerry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
23. WOW- I didn't realize Brinkman got 1000+ votes in the primary in Warren
County!! He is the uber-conservative that has called for a boycott of the election because Schmidt is not neo-con enough. If 1000+ people stay home this gives Hackett a little break in Warren County. I thought his popularity was mostly in Butler County. Let's hope!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
25. GUESS which counties haven't posted a zero sheet yet.

Warren. Go figure. Bastards.

Hamilton gets dishonerable mention because their live results link is still blank, too.

Brown, and Clermont are both zero counts as of a few minutes ago. Clermont's isn't a real zero sheet, Brown is a ES&S punchcard machine output copy.

I'll be keeping an eye out for URL changes or additions today and will post them here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
26. Kicking for a win in Ohio!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
29. Does anyone know where Blackwell or the other traitors are today?
Why should anyone feel optimistic that this will be a fair election with the thug having an open door into the voting machines in Ohio?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfan454 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
30. kick for Ohio !
Let's watch and see if Diebold steals it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
31. TV COVERAGE LINKS
Two Cincinnati TV stations will have full online coverage tonight.

WCPO-ABC
http://wcpo.com/news/

Channel Cincinnati NBC
http://www.channelcincinnati.com/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarolNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
32. This is great....
Thanks for these.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baltimore Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. Same day?
I'm sorry to seem so clueless, but are they having their primary and general on the same day? Confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiehardDemInFRG Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. No, they just haven't updated yet...

Apparently they don't post running 'scores' in these counties. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
33. Here are the Warren County primary numbers (useful stuff):
Edited on Tue Aug-02-05 10:17 AM by BullGooseLoony
REGISTERED VOTERS - DEMOCRAT 4,771

REGISTERED VOTERS - NON-PARTISAN 39,057

REGISTERED VOTERS - REPUBLICAN 17,754

REGISTERED VOTERS - TOTAL 61,582

BALLOTS CAST - DEMOCRAT 1,111 23.29%

BALLOTS CAST - NON-PARTISAN 0

BALLOTS CAST - REPUBLICAN 6,142 34.60

BALLOTS CAST - TOTAL 7,253 11.78


So, we're vastly outnumbered by the Repukes in that county, but look at the independents- there's a ton of them. Also looks like the Repukes had a greater turnout.

Those independents, though...

Just the primary numbers, anyway, and there are three other counties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. It will take massive defections
In two or three of the counties, Schmidt placed third in the June primary. Remember that she was in the Ohio General Assembly and lost her primary as an incumbent last time out. If those same people who voted against her then would rather have a Democrat than put up with her Schmidt for the next two years, Hackett has a shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #36
60. ,,,,,,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CAcyclist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
40. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiehardDemInFRG Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
42. Go Paul!!
:kick: for Ohio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. Kicking
:kick:

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
44. Great Post and thank you for sharing the links!
God, Please save us from the evil as we needed badly. O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
45. I hope Mr. Hackett had the foresight to implement some kind of check
against electronic fraWd. I had suggested last week that a "shadow" ballot be available for people to voluntarily identify themselves and their vote. I hope that or spmething of that nature is in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeanQuinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. I second that, nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
47. when do they start updating these pages?
These are from the primaries!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Vote tallies will not start until after the polls close...
First to go up wil be the counts by precinct of absentee...then as the precincts come in.

Don't expect any updates until at 7:30 or just after
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
49. The first link has changed to general election results.
I wish I could edit my OP. Oh well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reciprocity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
50. Hackett coverage coming up MSNBC. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobo Donating Member (452 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #50
62. A side note......

"Oh, but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you."

"Oh but if I went 'round sayin' I was Emperor, just because some moistened bint lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away."


Hobo

:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #62
69. Come see the violence inherent in the system!
Help! Help! I'm being oppressed!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
othermeans Donating Member (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #62
72. "Why its nothing but a bloody rabbit"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
personman Donating Member (959 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
51. I'm trying not to get my hopes up too high.
Edited on Tue Aug-02-05 01:24 PM by personman
I live in Ohio, just not one of the counties voting on this. 2004 taught me not get my hopes up. Luckily my county (Ashtabula County) which is the largest and poorest county in Ohio, was blue in 2004, but that was small consolation. It would be really really nice though to start kicking some of these corrupt, backwards, morally vacant assholes out of office.

-personman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #51
61. Well said.
We DUers in other locales are pulling for you Buckeyes! I'll be holding my breath...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
52. Reminder: TAKE MANY SCREENSHOTS.
Let's catch them in the act when they try their funny business.

PrintScreen > Paste into Paint > Save.

TAKE MANY SCREENSHOTS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. thats what were all thinking im afraid~ good advice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. Good idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FighttheFuture Donating Member (748 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
53. Exit Polls? Tell me how he has a chance in hell with no exit polls...
Without exit polls, and electronic machines and brownshirts in charge of most election functions in Ohio, how is he supposed to even have a chance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
54. What do the exit polls say?
haha, just kidding...really...just some levity...haha...ha...


KICK! :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
59. Funny clermont county results so far
Early Voting Election Day Provisional Total Percentage
PAUL HACKETT 0 0 0 0 0.00%
JEAN SCHMIDT 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Write In Votes 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total Votes Cast 0 0 0 0 100.00%

100% of the votes cast, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #59
63. 0% turnout lol
zero divided by zero = ERROR, so 100% is ok. should be 0%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
64. NYT is reporting a high turnout for this kind of election there
I think bits of this piece were added since it's earlier publishing- I know the part about Hackett voting is new because I read it earlier and that wasn't covered.

snip>
Both campaigns had TV and radio commercials sweeping the district, while campaign workers focused on get-out-the-vote efforts. Elections officials said turnout could be as high as 25 percent, a strong showing for a summertime special election.

http://nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Ohio-House-Race.html?hp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. no right wing comment yet on Hackett wearing "French" cuffs?
Edited on Tue Aug-02-05 04:57 PM by kodi
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #64
70. From Cincinnati Enquirer -- sorry if already posted

E-mail this Printer-friendly Subscribe RSS feeds

Tuesday, August 2, 2005

2nd district voters head to polls

By Howard Wilkinson
Enquirer staff writer

Voters from the east side of Cincinnati to Portsmouth were heading to the polls Tuesday to choose a new member of Congress.

Two months ago, the special election race in the 2nd Congressional District, which stretches across seven southern Ohio counties, was expected to be a low-key affair, a near-automatic win for whichever republican candidate emerged from the June 14 GOP primary. After all, the previous congressman, Republican Rob Portman, routinely won the district with more than 70 percent of the vote.

But Democrat Paul Hackett, a lawyer and Iraq war veteran from Indian Hill, managed to defy the odds and turn his battle with Republican Jean Schmidt, a former state representative from Clermont County, into a hotly-contested race, attracting national media attention and hundreds of thousands of campaign dollars flowing into the district from both national political parties.

In Hamilton County, the turnout appeared to be light-to-moderate, according to election officials. But hundreds of campaign volunteers on both sides were working feverishly to get voters to the polls, and both campaigns had extensive phone bank operations.

At the Hamilton County Board of Elections, election officials said their biggest problem Tuesday was fielding scores of calls from voters who live in the 1st Congressional District, complaining that they went to their regular polling places and found them closed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #64
103. John Glenn and Max Cleland campaigned for Hackett. good.


Hackett, who would be the first Iraq war combat veteran in Congress if elected, campaigned with fellow vets Monday. He also had weekend campaign help from two other veterans, former Sens. John Glenn of Ohio and Max Cleland of Georgia.

''This is what America is all about,'' Hackett said. ''This is democracy in action.''
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
67. All these links are on the front page of DU
Jeez!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #67
78. Precisely; they are the same post. What's your point? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
68. Just posted in another thread -- WCPO live results URL

No data yet but thanks to juliainyc for posting.

http://www.wcpo.com/news/2005/local/08/02/election_results.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synnical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #68
94. OH MY! 8:35 PM Hackett is leading!
Election Results
Last Updated: 8/02/2005 8:35pm
Note: You must refresh this page for updated results by clicking the reload button on your browser.

US HOUSE Ohio 2nd Dist
56 precincts of 753 reporting
PAUL HACKETT 6,562 51%
JEAN SCHMIDT 6,276 49%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synnical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
73. 7:30 kick for polls closing
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aasleka Donating Member (465 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #73
74. web pages
Hamilton county page down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. Hi, there!
Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeefanatic3 Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. 15 minutes polls have been closed
I haven't seen any results pouring in yet. What's the holdup?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #76
91. The suspense is killing me.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
77. Please someone who can==screenshot Brown County--it's a win.
I don't know how to do it.

thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeefanatic3 Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
79. HACKETT WINS BROWN COUNTY
Representative to Congress
(Vote For Not More Than ) 1
(WITH 35 OF 35 PRECINCTS COUNTED)
PAUL HACKETT (DEM) . . . . . . . 242 52.95
JEAN SCHMIDT (REP) . . . . . . . 213 46.61
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . 2 .44
Total . . . . . . . . . 457
Over Votes . . . . . . . . . 1
Under Votes . . . . . . . . . 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
80. Brown County shows Hackett the winner with 54%-47%--all 35 precincts in!
Edited on Tue Aug-02-05 06:50 PM by flpoljunkie
(WITH 35 OF 35 PRECINCTS COUNTED)
PAUL HACKETT (DEM) . . . . . . . 242 52.95
JEAN SCHMIDT (REP) . . . . . . . 213 46.61
WRITE-IN. . . . . . . . . . . 2 .44
Total . . . . . . . . . 457
Over Votes . . . . . . . . . 1
Under Votes . . . . . . . . . 2


http://66.241.236.181/elect/ohbrown/results.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeBushytail Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #80
82. Anyone know anything about Brown County?
Dem/Repub breakdown?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #82
83. Brown 2004... Bush: 64% - Kerry: 36%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
81. Official Thread over here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #81
85. Absentees Hacket - 1,629 Schmidt - 1,964
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mconvente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
84. wtf with those brown results??
35 of 35 precincts reporting, 1.57% turnout!!???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sean Reynolds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #84
86. Absentee Results.
That's what it says on that link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mconvente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #86
88. oh sorry - my bad
but that's good - he won absentees at least. Let's kick it for Hackett!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Halliburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #88
89. winning absentees is huge
considering they usually favor redud. we still don't have enough data, but this is an excellent start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aasleka Donating Member (465 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #88
90. ?
Hi, and thank you.

over 2,000 absentee ballots cast but only 440 people actually voted?

That sounds weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mconvente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
92. brown shows hackett at 58%
up ~400 only 2.5% or so reported
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theangrydem Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
93. Hackett has small lead %51 to %49
Pray for a miracle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lizzieforkerry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
95. This is the best link to see all counties' totals as they are reported
http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050802/NEWS01/308020015

Sorry if this is a dupe, I didn't see it anywhere but there are a LOT of Hackett threads right now!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #95
97. Must be heavy traffic--won't load the whole page.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debdemoe Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #95
98. Link
Thanks LizzieForKerry! The link works fine for me... just take a while to load.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synnical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #95
108. 9:38 PM 50/50 w/81% reporting
That site is all graphics. Takes a while to load.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lizzieforkerry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
96. There is a difference between what Brown county is reporting and
what the Enquirer is reporting for Brown county. Both sites say it for 100% precincts reporting. Can someone screenshot the Brown County- I don't know how to do that!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #96
99. new tally on this site. With 250 precincts of 753 Hack has 18,476 52%



2 nd District Vote Tally < Hit refresh >
With 250 precincts of 753 reporting at 9:06 pm :
Paul Hackett (D) 18,476 52%
Jean Schmidt (R) 17,064 48%
Tally courtesy of WLWT

http://www.cincynation.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #99
100. oh oh--the lady is catching up--tally here again. 305 precincts


http://www.cincynation.com/

nd District Vote Tally < Hit refresh >
With 305 precincts of 753 reporting at 9:20 pm :
Paul Hackett (D) 23,957 51%
Jean Schmidt (R) 22,846 49%
Tally courtesy of WLWT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #100
101. now 50 to 50 with 409 of 753 precincts,


http://www.cincynation.com/

2nd District Vote Tally < Hit refresh >
With 409 precincts of 753 reporting at 9:29 pm :
Paul Hackett (D) 30,322 50%
Jean Schmidt (R) 29,776 50%
Tally courtesy of WLWT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #101
102. Schmidt is in the lead now


52% to 48%

I feel sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #102
105. Are you guys adding all the counties?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mapster Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
104. Thise site has her ahead
http://www.wcpo.com/news/2005/local/08/02/election_results.html

US HOUSE Ohio 2nd Dist
580 precincts of 753 reporting
JEAN SCHMIDT 45,134 52%
PAUL HACKETT 42,342 48%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #104
106. What percentage of vote is left?


Are there big democratic counties still out?

AND - does this mean anything at all, since Ohio is a rigged state?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #106
117. What makes you think Ohio is a 'rigged state'?
Edited on Tue Aug-02-05 09:08 PM by Dr_eldritch
What reason do you have to think that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #117
157. Are you serious or dripping sarcasm?


:shrug:


:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #104
107. she sure is!! DRATSSSSSSS!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #107
109. 580 precincts of 753 reporting--Hackett (D) 42,342 48% (falling behind



http://www.cincynation.com/

2nd District Vote Tally < Hit refresh >
With 580 precincts of 753 reporting at 9:39 pm :
Paul Hackett (D) 42,342 48%
Jean Schmidt (R) 45,134 52%
Tally courtesy of WLWT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirtyDawg Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #109
110. Hell, in Ohio that's close enough....
...that there's no way the repigs are gonna lose that one. There will have been irregularities out the ass all over the district. Just wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #110
112. Precincts Reporting - 580 out of 763 - 77%, Hack is at 48% only!!


http://www.channelcincinnati.com/politics/4800140/detail.html
ug. 2 Special Election
U.S. House (Ohio Second District)
Candidate Votes Percent Winner
Jean Schmidt (R) 45,134 52%
Paul Hackett (D) 42,342 48%
Precincts Reporting - 580 out of 763 - 77%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackspade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #109
111. So...
in 33 minutes the percentage has totally flipped?
sounds fishy to me. especially if it stays 48-52.

what a travesty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mapster Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #111
113. Closer to 50-50 right now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #113
114. 662 precincts of 753 reporting --YES now Hack is catching up!!


http://www.wcpo.com/news/2005/local/08/02/election_results.html
Election Results
Last Updated: 8/02/2005 9:51pm


http://www.wcpo.com/news/2005/local/08/02/election_results.html
Election Results
Last Updated: 8/02/2005 9:51pm
Note: You must refresh this page for updated results by clicking the reload button on your browser.

US HOUSE Ohio 2nd Dist
662 precincts of 753 reporting

JEAN SCHMIDT 49,681 50%

PAUL HACKETT 48,811 50%

JEAN SCHMIDT 49,681 50%

PAUL HACKETT 48,811 50%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBear Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #114
115. Is it odd???
Is it odd that Clermont County is the one still counting???

J.
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #115
116. 88% of precinits, 50 to 50 yet with Hact about 150 votes ahead


http://www.channelcincinnati.com/politics/4800140/detail.html
U.S. House (Ohio Second District)
Candidate Votes Percent Winner
Jean Schmidt (R) 49,681 50%
Paul Hackett (D) 48,811 50%
Precincts Reporting - 662 out of 763 - 88%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leafy Geneva Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #115
118. Good question - Clermont is WAY behind all the other counties
Is there a logical reason for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBear Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #118
119. Clermont
Were'nt they the ones who had the lockdown in 2004???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #115
120. I was involved in the Recount in Ohio after '04 election and
Clermont BOE was uncooperative and basically nasty.....I think it is very strange that the vote has stopped....it has been stuck for quite a while now....and of course this is the county where Mean Jean lives....

I don't know why they are holding up the results....unless it is just to be mean....we figured Clermont would go for Mean Jean....

I hate living here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #120
122. They have to cook the results first......
then they will turn them in. They are waiting to see how many to cook them by so they are garenteed a "win".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lizzieforkerry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #120
123. Yeah, let's move to Brown County. Who knew they were so smart?
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #120
161. Isn't it Schmidt's home county?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoosier Donating Member (199 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
121. Still damn tight...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #121
124. cnn reporting just now that Hack has a narrow lead. this site at 88%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #124
125. this site not moving in last 10 minutes either. still 50-50


http://www.wcpo.com/news/2005/local/08/02/election_results.html
Election Results
Last Updated: 8/02/2005 10:18pm
Note: You must refresh this page for updated results by clicking the reload button on your browser.

US HOUSE Ohio 2nd Dist
662 precincts of 753 reporting

JEAN SCHMIDT 49,681 50%

PAUL HACKETT 48,811 50%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #124
128. Whatever happens - Hackett should get a recount


And, what is this - Schmidt - INSIDE the polling place - Isn't that illegal???

I live in MA (true blue & liberal to the core thank goodness), & we can't even stand with signs within so many feet of the voting booth OUTSIDE the polling station.

What is the deal with that?

This election looks incredibly close - but with Ohio vote fraud being what it is - who knows?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #124
129. please let it be true damnit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #121
126. too damm tight I say!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #126
130. nothing moving here either!!!! too tooo close
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lizzieforkerry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
127. I'm starting to think the machines must have gone down.
Something is keeping them from reporting the results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #127
132. something is stuck that is for sure. i just checked again. still the same
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #132
134. paul down by 800 on this site. 91% precinints reporting. oh oh oh oh!!


http://swingstateproject.com/
August 02, 2005
OH-2: It's Gonna Be a Long Night
Posted by Tim Tagaris

It's gonna be a long night. 91 precincts remaining out of 191 in Clermont County is all that's left. Paul is down 800 votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBear Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #127
133. Clermont County Site Down?
I just got Service Unavailable from the Clermont County site....

Those tallying machines are not supposed to be networked!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnkerryyip145 Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #127
142. Settle Down
The only reason no more numbers are coming up on the website is b/c they're about 10 minutes from airtime for the local news. The TV stations probably already have the results but want you to tune in to find out. For us locals that's easy...For you's guys, well, i'll tell you what i find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lizzieforkerry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
131. Somebody needs to go to Tabby's in Mason and ask what is going on.
That's where a lot of the campaign people were going to get the results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #131
136. you go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lizzieforkerry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #136
151. I can't my kids are in bed....sorry
I actually thought about waking them, but thought that might not put me on the Best Mom in the World List.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aasleka Donating Member (465 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #131
137. no provisional ballots?
Some places say 662 precincts counted others say 685 but they have the same vote tallies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RSchewe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
135. What is taking so long for these last precints to get counted?
If this takes any longer I am gonna be tempted to bust out the Heavy Duty Reynolds Wrap, the thick one...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meppie-meppie not Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #135
138. I believe they are counting them by hand...a caller just said something
to this effect on Mike Malloy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #138
140. if it stays this close there will be recount anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBear Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #140
147. Margin more like 5000 now
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lizzieforkerry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #147
153. link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #135
139. this county by couty site has Hack about 110 votes ahead.


http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/200...
uesday, August 2, 2005

Interactive: 2nd District results by county
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBear Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #139
143. Rural Counties!
Notice that ALL of the rural counties in this district went for Hackett! That is ODD!

Oh, and how can the hand count crashed DRE machines??

:bounce:
Time for wearing of Orange!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pazarus Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
141. Cinicinnati Nation says the "Voting Equipment crashes in Clermont County"
With Schmidt currently 800 in the lead.

Why must everything be so close? I'm excited he's doing this well, but jeez, it 50.44 to 49.56 for Schmidt, which means either way the legitimacy will be questioned, AGAIN.

and a crash, huh? In one of the most Republican counties in the country, something goes wrong with the voting machines right before a close race? I won't believe it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBear Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #141
144. Clermont County is finished!
And he lost - odd how it just went dark and she magically jumped 2% in the total!

I am wearing Orange tomorrow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #144
148. Hack lost???????? oh NO!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #141
145. a crash--this close to the end!! umm....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #145
146. same results a half hour later at this site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnkerryyip145 Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
149. Schmidt Wins 52-48%
According to Fox 19 News. They closed by clarifying that the elections boards are bi-partisan but that "there will be questions about why Clermont COunty came in late and we'll follow up on that story" (paraphrasing)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #149
152. thanks but this sure is depressing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnkerryyip145 Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #149
154. Confirmed by ABC 12 News
Schmidt won by about 3500 votes, but their story is about how this is the best showing by a Democrat in a long, long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pazarus Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #154
159. confirmed by CNN
their story is the generic 'democrat loses in close election'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adolfo Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
150. Clermont is still counting
Clermont County is the only
county still counting votes at 10:41 pm.
100 of 191 counties have reported results there.

http://www.cincynation.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #150
155. Paul Hackett (D) 48,811 49.56%; and her 50.44%
from your website:

Vote counting resumes
in Clermont County
The vote count has resumed in Clermont County after having earlier technical problems.

At 10:54 pm, Paul Hackett and Jean Schmidt were neck and neck in the vote count, with the Republican candidate slightly ahead. All results were in, except for Clermont County which was yet to report the tally from 91 precincts. But, with Hackett 800 votes behind it is unlikely that he would be able to catch up. Unfortunately for Hackett, he is getting 30,000 less votes than what Democrat Charles Sanders got in 2004 against Rob Portman, meaning a lot of Sanders-Kerry voters stayed home today.

2nd District Vote Tally < Hit refresh >
With 685 precincts of 753 reporting at 10:54 pm :
Paul Hackett (D) 48,811 49.56%
Jean Schmidt (R) 49,681 50.44%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adolfo Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
158. Clermont results should be double checked
I think Clermont County results should be double checked. Is it normal to change the listing order of candidates?

Paul Hackett was listed first until the results started coming in. Here is a copy:

------------------------------------------------------------
Special General 2005
8/2/05
08/02/05, 09:28:08 AM
0 of 191 Precincts Reporting

Representative to Congress 2nd District (Vote for: 1)
Early Voting Election Day Provisional Total Percentage
PAUL HACKETT 0 0 0 0 0.00%
JEAN SCHMIDT 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Write In Votes 0 0 0 0 0.00%
Total Votes Cast 0 0 0 0 100.00%
------------------------------------------------------------

Special General 2005
8/2/05
08/02/05, 08:24:09 PM
0 of 191 Precincts Reporting

Representative to Congress 2nd District (Vote for: 1)
Early Voting Election Day Provisional Total Percentage
JEAN SCHMIDT 1158 0 0 1158 60.60%
PAUL HACKETT 750 0 0 750 39.25%
Write In Votes 3 0 0 3 0.16%
Total Votes Cast 1911 0 0 1911 100.00%
------------------------------------------------------------

:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC