Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

fired CIA officer and valerie plame worked in same unit of agency

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 10:08 PM
Original message
fired CIA officer and valerie plame worked in same unit of agency
Edited on Mon Aug-01-05 10:09 PM by dajoki
in spring of 2001 he/she said iraq's nuclear components from their scuttled program were available for inspection or even purchase. NOW GET THIS, even though he/she worked in same unit as plame "THE OFFICER'S NAME REMAINS SECRET, IN PART BECAUSE DISCLOSING IT MIGHT JEOPARDIZE THE AGENCY'S SOURCES OR OPERATIONS." he/she is suing the CIA. NYT article 8/1/05 http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/01/politics/01weapons.html?th&emc=th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. I sure hope Fitzgerald's investigation is on the up & up..
And that he can't be bought or persuaded.

They don't seem to be too concerned at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue about the inquiry.. Makes you wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. why no leak here?
proves to me they were out to get wilson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klebean Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. the CIA's move to classify the motion to declassify the lawsuit
at the end of the article - read it - so indicative of the reality we're facing now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "to conceal politically embarrising facts from public scrutiny"
embarass who?:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. So the theory is that someone didn't want this unit to be effective?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. very likely...
because they had the evidence the administration was lying about WMD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. kick again
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC