Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WSJ Question of the day:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 02:26 AM
Original message
WSJ Question of the day:
Was Bush right to appoint Bolton as U.N. ambassador without a Senate vote?

YES 45%
NO 55%

http://discussions.wsj.com/n/mb/message.asp?webtag=wsjvoices&tid=3590&vote=2&submit=Vote

And comments:


- No.

Mr. Bush is pigheaded to a fault. There's enough of a clamor about Mr. Bolton that this is almost a no-win scenario for the Bush administration. Unless Mr. Bolton does an utterly unimpeachable job -- which appears unlikely, given his record -- Mr. Bush will be roundly criticized for letting loyalty get in the way of good judgment yet again.

I must confess that I'm mystified at the suggestion that Mr. Bush is "getting the job done." Exactly which job? Winning the war on terror -- um, beg pardon, the global struggle against extremism? Reforming social security? Capturing Osama bin Laden? Bringing a stable government to Iraq while gaining a Middle East stronghold and supporter for the U.S.?

How about improving access to health care? Or international relations? (Were those even on the agenda?)

Mr. Bush has excelled at one job: Rewarding his cronies.


- Bush may be getting the job done, but that depends on how you define what his job. If the job is providing America with the best possible representation at the UN and facilitating good working relationships with the world's governments, then he has failed miserably. Bolton simply isn't the best qualified person for this job no matter how you measure it. But, if the job is rewarding a political hack, then Bush as done well. As the vice president noted, Bolton "deserves any job in this administration that he wants." Well, he got it even though it was through the back door.


- It is the talk about the Senate's "advise and consent" roll that I find troubling. Did the framers of the constitution view the Senate as a bunch of yes men (and women) when it came to the choice of ambassadors, Federal Justices, and other appointed offices? Unlikely. These are the people who believed in division of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Starfury Donating Member (615 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Here's another poll on Bolton (Lou Dobbs):
Do you think President Bush was right to appoint John Bolton as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations during the congressional recess?

Yes 15% 759 votes
No 85% 4286 votes
Total: 5045 votes

http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/lou.dobbs.tonight/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC