http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5445086/You have a contradiction here. Here we are at war over extending democracy in the world. What we’re trying to sell in Iraq is consensus, consensus among the warring factions and democratic systems. Yet, here we have someone going to the United Nations to make that case, who didn’t pass muster with the opposition in the U.S. Senate, who wasn’t accepted by Condoleezza Rice as her number two person at state and who clearly isn’t a consensus type individual. It is a contradiction, but that said, he’s the President’s man, he’s the Vice-President’s man, and he definitely shares the type of thinking that took U.S. into the war in Iraq. He is the man who emblemizes the war in Iraq better than anyone could.
I’m not sure if any of us in journalism know how he got picked. He doesn’t seem to be the logical candidate. He’s not a charmer. He’s not a diplomat, either by profession or temperament. He’s a hard-line hawk. He is a man involved in arms control. That puts him right on the cutting edge of the reason we went to war, a nuclear threat from Iraq. He is hardly a consensus candidate. It’s not clear how the President came to this decision, he may have taken the advice and consent not of the Senate, but of Vice-President Dick Chaney.
Well, all Presidents make recess appointments. Clinton did it when he put an African-American into a Fourth Circuit Court appointment. An appointment that Clinton definitely wanted filled by an African American. So it’s not extraordinary. In this case we’re picking someone for the title. Catch the job description, “permanent representative to the United Nations from America”. Well, he’s only going to serve in this case for a little more than a year, he’s certainly more like a temp than a permanent representative, It’s an appointment that can’t be re-upped. He can only serve until the beginning of the next session of Congress so it certainly puts him in a position of not really being able to do the job. For better or worse he’s a good representative of the thinking of this administration in terms of foreign policy. He is not, however, a consensus builder, that’s going to be clear.
Email us at Hardblogger@msnbc.com