Call for screen shots! What were nos. before Clermont got all wet?

[kitkat65]

At what time was it announced they were hand counting?

Just what percentange of Clermont would you have to have in order to get the quasi-final 52%/48%?

[RoyGBiv]

1. Before the hand count ...

This is a screen shot I took of a website reporting numbers before the reports of a hand count/humidity problem started. I don't know if it means anything. It is what it is.

OnEdit: The time is when I actually took the screen shot, because someone asked for one. I had loaded the page well before I took the actual shot. All other precincts were 100% reported.

[OzarkDem]

4. Has anyone ever heard

of a hand count done on election night?

[RoyGBiv]

6. Yes and no ...

I've personally experienced a hand count being done on election night. It wasn't anything particularly controversial. Several precincts had power problems due to a thunderstorm, and the people in charge of these things wanted to make sure it was all done right and proper.

What I have not heard of is a hand count requiring anything less than all night to accomplish. You can actually do it in a few hours, but, if you're being careful, check your results.

I note that the channelcincinnati.com site has not given a final result as of 11:32 pm central time. Their election results page is still reporting the numbers where they were at the time the hand count was announced. I don't know if that means anything, but there it is.

I also hear Hackett has conceded, so it's probably a moot point.

[DeepModem Mom]

2. kick

[Horse with no Name]

3. Didn't have screen shots but numbers were

9:43
Schmidt 45143
Hackett 42342

9:47
Schmidt 49681
Hackett 48811

Then over an hour later

Schmidt 57974
Hackett 54401

[AuntPatsy]

5. This doesn't need to get buried....shout it so that it echos

throughout this country.