Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clark Clealand 08?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 09:46 PM
Original message
Clark Clealand 08?
I have been kicking around this ticket in the back of my head for awhile now. What do you think? yay or nay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. If Obama gets to be AG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunDrop23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. I like Clark/Clinton or Clark/Edwards better right now...
Edited on Mon Aug-08-05 09:50 PM by SunDrop23
My mind is subject to change.

Barak for Secy of State.
Edwards as AG in a Clark/Clinton administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
election_2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Um, Clark wouldn't NEED Clinton...
She would just add baggage as his V.P.

If Clark is the nominee and considers picking a woman as his running mate, his top choices should be: Kathleen Sebelius (Governor of Kansas), Debbie Stabenow (Michigan U.S. Senator), and Kathleen Babineaux Blanco (Governor of Louisiana).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. I thought Cleland was thinking of running in Georgia
for LG or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Cleland was the hero of many Georgia school kids in the 1980's...


He is still quite popular in GA- despite the '02 smear campaign...

He really has a way of engaging folks- and people dont forget him- LG or Guv would be awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Do you have any contact info?
I am a disabled person and Max is my personal hero. When things get bad for me I just tell my self what he must go thru on a daily basis. The man is truly amazing and that's what probably promoted my little pipe dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. No- I dont know how to contact him.
I met him at a YD function several years ago and at another party function in Richmond County- he was popular even when he was Sec of State in GA in the '80s-when I was in the 7th grade...

Perhaps you can contact him through one of his vet groups or somthing? Does anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. His health is delicate- but I would support that.
Max is a great guy- I've met him and he is really good at making people feel good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't like it, but I don't like Clark as a candidate to begin with
He doesn't strike me as a Democrat. More of a neutral, like Powell, who is aligning with the Dems now for reasons of ambition. He's not a bad guy, I just don't trust him to be loyal to Democratic ideals, since I don't think that's what he's about.

Clinton, Gore and Kerry are my top picks. But I'm waiting to see who else hops in the ring. Clark, Dean and Biden aren't on the list at all for me, for different reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. So are you saying Clark is pulling the wool over the eyes
of men like George McGovern, Michael Moore, Andrew Young--all of whom endorsed him for president in 2004?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I'm saying what I said
I can make up my own mind.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xkenx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. The "Duck" Principle
Ducks don't wear signs labeling them ducks. If it has a ducksbill, waddles like a duck, quacks like a duck, swims like a duck, then you know it's a duck.

Wes Clark is one of the Democratic Party's foremost progressives by virtue of his actions over the years, not by any labels that people want to throw at him simply because he had a career in the military.
It is time to appreciate just how lucky we are to have this national treasure. Just a few items:

--Clark was always butting heads with the stereotypical "macho" military Neanderthals because he saw the horrors of war firsthand in Vietnam and always espoused "diplomacy first."
--Clark was one of the leaders of the all-volunteer Army created after the Vietnam debacle. To keep personnel in you had to do a good job of providing for their family needs, health, education, equal opportunity.
--Clark actually won environmental awards at bases under his command.
--When Clark was working at the Pentagon in the mid-90s, he was virtually the only voice crying out to intervene in Rwanda.
--It was Clark's voice, along with Madeline Albright, who persuaded the Clinton Admin., over the objections of the Pentagon, to stop the ethnic cleansing in Kosovo. Tell the Kosovar Albanians that Wes Clark isn't a liberal, progressive, humanitarian.
--It was Wes Clark's voice prior to the Iraq invasion who urged that we exhaust all possible diplomatic means before any military action, including in testimony to Congress.
--It was Wes Clark who filed an Amicus Curiae brief in the University
of Michigan affirmative action case.

Since when is it some kind of a black mark for someone to give to his country by serving in the military if he does so in a principled manner? Wes Clark felt that he could make the most impact by providing a progressive voice to that institution.

As for voting for Nixon and Reagan, he did so 20-30 years ago, simply because he felt they were strong on national security. Clark discovered that the modern Republican Party is so different they wouldn't have Nixon, and maybe not even Reagan. Clark evolved to where he started voting for Democrats, and then officially registering as a Democrat after registering as Independent for many years. Reagan WAS a democrat prior to running for Gov. of California. Are any Democrats wanting to say that Reagan, in his later years was a Democrat, simply because he started out that way?

So I'd have to say Wes Clark is my Democrat, liberal, progressive "DUCK" because he has proved it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Who are you talking to?
That's a nice summary of something, I guess, but it has nothing to do with what I said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarolNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Maybe you need to read ken's post again...
It may not be what you wanted to hear but I think his list of ways that Wes Clark has acted on Democratic ideals even as he was part of an institution that is seen as mostly conservative is a direct answer to your statement that you "don't trust him to be loyal to Democratic ideals."

What exactly am I missing here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xkenx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Carol NYC
Thanks for you "More Succinct Than I Was" support.
Some people just have blinders on or agendas of their own and wouldn't recognize or acknowledge things it they fell from the sky and hit them on the head, but we keep trying. That's why Wes Clark's supporters are the most dedicated; we have discovered what it means to have this national treasure working for Democrats and for all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarolNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. I hear ya, xkenx
I think some come here and throw out these comments but aren't expecting to have them rebutted in a reasoned and reasonable way...and then when they get an answer they don't expect, they either attempt to divert the discussion or jump ugly.

But, no worries, for the most part I think that Dems are open minded and intelligent people. Remember, the truth is on our side. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-05 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think that'd be great!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'm in if Al Sharpton gets appointed Press Secretary
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatrioticOhioLiberal Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. ROFL n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC