|
I posted this to my MyDD blog:
The choreographed blitz has begun. So predictable from the pawns while the princes stay in hiding.
The only dramatic element of the Drudge story is the exclamation mark. Everything else is not drama but farce, a blatant snatching of parts of a a woman's pained 2004 account from here and some other parts from there to create the illusion of flip flop.
All in an attempt to rescue our "bring em on!" marionette who in truth is shaming presidential manhood by a pitiful unwillingness to be held accountable for his own words.
Mrs. Sheehan does not exaggerate nor flip flop in telling a truth that swift-bloaters cannot avoid.
George is casual ... way too casual in his ability to project empathy.
George is casual ... way too casual in his inability to express any kind of sincere phrase that reflects a generosity of spirit that he lacks.
Swift-bloaters cannot compensate for that behavior and Sheehan's portrayal of what happened in full historical context of her 2004 encounter with a programmed political stooge resembles nothing constructed out of the drudge sludge that was published today.
Many of us who made a voting decision in 2000 saw that shallow lack of empathy immediately. Yet unhampered by the loss of a loved one in a moment when one seeks nobility and reason for a loss, we have yet to find ourselves looking to Bush for validation of such a terrible loss.
In 2004 a lot more than 34% of the wise electorate was willing to trust the sincerity that was never there.
In 2005 even one word from his lips generates a suspicion of lying and disinformation, no expectation of consoling from the man who lied to get us there, to get our troops into a turkey shoot and who can't find words to console because he flat out doesn't have them.
Drudge has a hard row to hoe. The choir he misdirects is shrinking.
Smearing the mother of a dead soldier is an act of desperation his prompters have no courage to take ... not when they can find someone dumb or desperate enough to do it for them.
|