Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WaPo: Congressional Civil Liberties panel STILL hasn't met after 8 months

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 12:51 AM
Original message
WaPo: Congressional Civil Liberties panel STILL hasn't met after 8 months
Now that Congress is getting ready to extend Patriot Act provisions, it's time and past time to evaluate its effects on civil liberties. But the committee called for eight months ago to do this has not even met.

It's just another paper promise from the Bush neocons.

According to the article, only one of the five members of this non-committee is a "liberal." We can guess the politics of the other four.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/07/AR2005080700903_pf.html

Civil Liberties Panel Is Off to a Sluggish Start


Critics Decry Administration's Lack of Urgency
By Caroline Drees
Reuters
Monday, August 8, 2005; Page A13

A civil liberties board ordered by Congress last year has never met to discuss its job of protecting rights in the fight against terrorism, and critics say it is a toothless, under-funded shell with inadequate support from President Bush.

Lawmakers including some Republicans, civil rights advocates, a member of the Sept. 11 commission and a member of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board have expressed concerns.

(snip)

The intelligence reform law of December 2004 called for the oversight board in response to a recommendation from the Sept. 11 commission, which feared that increased governmental powers needed to fight terrorism could erode civil liberties.

(snip)

But almost eight months after its inception, critics say the panel still exists only on paper, and lacks the money, power and presidential backing to ensure the entire government respects Americans' rights.

(snip)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. this is because there is no intention of "defending" civil liberties
They rather intend to revoke them all, and all rights along with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly. It's so typical of the brazen lies of the Bush Administration to
gesture grandly (as with pretending to set up this committee) and then switch attention and let the gesture die before it acomplishes anything but public relations. Same thing happened with the underfunding of "no child left behind" and so much else.

The initial gesture gets news coverage, the behind-the-scenes destruction of any possible real accomplishment is silent.

Protect civil liberties? That's the opposite of what this administration is about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is a good example of how the Bush Administration operates -
big lies and broken promises - and the assumption that no one will ever call them on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC