|
If we review the postings on August 6th from Michael Moore's website, we would see that there were no postings of Mrs. Sheehan's vigil for most of the day.
As I am sure that many like myself have done, I referred a headline and a link to the Iconoclast website to michaelmoore.com. Some time later, I received a thank you email from the site for the "heads up." When I returned to the site, there was a small blurb on the homepage referring to her vigil. IT WAS NOT UNTIL THE FOLLOWING DAY that I saw more focus placed on Mrs. Sheehan. Trust me, I check his site at least 40 times a day.
And so, the O'reilley assumption is BUNK.
if there is anyone out there who had referred this story to michaelmoore.com and received a reply, please post it and forward it to me. I shall compile all of them and post them around.
Thx!
Here's the reply I received: (blanked out the address so he is not inundated with email) From: ******@michaelmoore.com Subject: Re: CINDY SHEEHAN Date: August 6, 2005 4:39:06 PM EDT To: noone@designfromnowhere.com
Andrew,
Thanks for the heads-up. Just posted it. Much appreciated.
Peace, Eric
|