Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Coleen Rowley: Get past Bush's war rhetoric

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:41 PM
Original message
Coleen Rowley: Get past Bush's war rhetoric
Coleen Rowley: Get past Bush's war rhetoric to see what has or has not worked

Coleen Rowley
August 10, 2005

Last week another 25 young Americans gave their lives in the quagmire called Iraq. However, just before these latest casualties, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Gen. Richard Myers unexpectedly dared to float the much more apt, useful description of the broader battle as a "global struggle against violent extremism."

But Rumsfeld's temporary totter with reality and away from his party's line was too much for the (again) vacationing president, who emerged from his Crawford ranch to proclaim: No -- it's still the same old "war on terror."

So all ended well in Roveland. The shrewd wordsmithers know it's obviously better to be seen as a "war president" than as a president who is struggling.

There had been some early signs of clarity, however, despite the continuing disintegration of Iraq. With their eyes fixed on what apparently matters the most to them (the 2006 congressional elections), the president and his generals had begun to think of "cutting and running."

Of course, that's not what they'd call it. But avoiding the same drawn-out, bloody end as occurred in Vietnam is reason enough to let the administration play loose with its terms ... and perhaps even the truth.

Sadly, if the analogy to Vietnam holds true, as it has so far, it will be several more years (as many as 12, in Rumsfeld's most recent guess), until the Iraq war dead multiply to fill another Vietnam-like Wall.

Actually, getting out of Iraq, no matter how it is marketed, could ironically mark the first real, not just rhetorical, change that must be made in the global struggle against violent extremism.

From the firsthand perspective of Minneapolis resident Sami Rasouli, director of the Muslim Peacemakers Team (who spent the last several months in his native country of Iraq and is now on his way back to help Christian and Muslim groups with peacemaking and rebuilding efforts), ending the American occupation is the only hope of quelling the ever-worsening factional infighting and insurgency.

His opinion is seconded to a large extent by British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, who observed Aug. 2 that the presence of U.S. and British troops in Iraq is fueling the insurgency.

Ending American/British occupation of Iraq will also remove at least some ideological fuel of the violent extremism that has caused terrorist attacks elsewhere in the world.

State Department figures have apparently shown the number of terrorist incidents soaring: from 2003's 20-year record of 175 incidents that killed 625 people -- to 651 such attacks that killed 1,907 in 2004.

Although a change in counting methodology may have accounted for some of the increase, it's impossible to now argue that we are winning the "war" on terrorism.

Despite the reluctance of the British and American governments to accept the obvious, their own intelligence services attribute the growing violence to reaction to US/UK actions in Iraq and Afghanistan.

One thing is certain: To prevent further attacks on our shores, and those of our allies, it is essential to cut through the president's war rhetoric to shed light on what has or has not worked in the actual global struggle against violent extremism.

We must put politics aside to unravel the mistakes that have made us less safe and determine what constructive steps can be taken to actually produce a safer world.

We simply cannot continue to go it alone. The United States and Britain need the rest of the world's help to bring peace to Iraq. We can gain more international support and defuse some Iraqi resentment by convincing them that we are not in Iraq for oil or military bases.

Wars of words can surely get our blood boiling, but it will take a global struggle against extremism, waged judiciously, to actually make us safer.

Coleen Rowley, Apple Valley, is a retired FBI agent who last month announced that she will seek the DFL nomination to run against U.S. Rep. John Kline in 2006.

http://www.coleenrowley.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. excellent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC