Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Vanity Fair' Rips Media 'Conspiracy' in Covering Up Role, Plame Scanda

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 10:14 PM
Original message
'Vanity Fair' Rips Media 'Conspiracy' in Covering Up Role, Plame Scanda
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/081205Y.shtml

'Vanity Fair' Rips Media 'Conspiracy' in Covering Up Role in Plame Scandal

By Greg Mitchell
Editor & Publisher

Thursday 11 August 2005

New York - In an article in the September issue of Vanity Fair (not yet online), Michael Wolff, in probing the Plame/CIA leak scandal, rips those in the news media - principally Time magazine and The New York Times - who knew that Karl Rove was one of the leakers but refused to expose what would have been "one of the biggest stories of the Bush years." Not only that, "they helped cover it up." You might say, he adds, they "became part of a conspiracy."

If they had burned this unworthy source and exposed his "crime," he adds, it would have been "of such consequences that it might, reasonably, have presaged the defeat of the president, might have even - to be slightly melodramatic - altered the course of the war in Iraq." In doing so they showed they owed their greatest allegiance to the source, not their readers.

And their source was no Deep Throat, not someone with dirt on the government - the source "was the government."

So in the end, he concludes, "the greatest news organizations in the land had a story about a potential crime that reached as close as you can get to the president himself and they punted, they swallowed it, they self-dealt." And why did they do it? Well, "a source is a source who, unrevealed, will continue to be a source."

Even after the news first emerged last month that Rove had leaked to Cooper, the media still waited days to even ask the White House press secretary about it. It was a story, "in full view, the media just ignored."

..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. It seems if we want to get real news and the truth, we might just
have to give up cable tv and buy Vanity Fair. They have been awesome the last couple of months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. they have been amazing
history will judge them kindly..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. that was a good article
Judy Miller was recognized as a mouthpiece for the administration in the lead up to the war. People who cry about her being jailed think she has been behaving as a real journalist when she has been an insider all along. I think that Fitzgerald sees her as that more than a journalist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. We CAN multi-task!!!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. he he...
amazing isn't it? :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks for posting G_j... !! ~~~ Gotta quick question..
I'm trying to remember.. Doesn't Fitzgerald have a timeline for completing his investigation and turning over his findings?

If so.. anyone recall when that date is? Thanks! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tibbir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think it's in October sometime.
Also, now that there's been a change-up at the DOJ I wonder what his chances of an extension are should he need one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. good question
Edited on Sun Aug-14-05 09:39 AM by G_j
I'm not sure...but I think I heard Oct. also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. one more..
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
growlypants Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Dear Jesus...........PLEASE work a miracle and let them IMPEACH
this A-HOLE and EVERYONE in his administration. I promise I'll be a good girl from now on if you do. Really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. yep, the whole crew need to be impeached and held accountable
and welcome to DU growlypants ! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. And ...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC