Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

the Fix is still in

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 01:03 PM
Original message
the Fix is still in

http://www.clarionledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050812/NEWS01/508120384/1002


Hinds: No new voting machines for us


-snip-

Thirty-six of Mississippi's 82 counties have signed onto the state's plan to conduct elections on Diebold machines — touch-screen voting machines that have been criticized in some states.

"We did so much research. We wanted to make sure our choice would be the best choice," Hinds County Election Commissioner Lelia Gaston Rhodes said about the county's machines from Texas-based Shoup Voting Solutions.

-snip-

Terry resident Terrell Wilson said the county's machine "was pretty fast. I didn't have any problems with it."

-snip-

Lee County Election Commissioner John Wages said he is concerned that hackers could change the vote totals and leave without a trace. Others claim that the machines are not user-friendly for disabled voters.

The state said the claims are baseless and released documents Thursday detailing the selection of Diebold, including a portion of the contract. Many of the contract's specifics, however, remain under court seal to protect the company's competitive information.
-snip-
--------------------------


Yeah, the fix is still in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. There should be no "competitive information" allowances on VOTING
Private enterprise for profit is not my god, and it should not be applied to the fundamental right of voting. Regardless what Scalia and others think, voting is a RIGHT, and its accessibility and fairness should be unquestioned. The very idea that a for-profit entity has more rights than our citizens is deeply wrong.

Voting machines should not be commercial ventures. Pay the motherfuckers off and dip into the treasury to give them a decent return, but the machines should have source code that everyone can see, and there should be a paper trail for every one of them.

There is absolutely no moral argument against this; any that's advanced is premised on the assumption that private business is vastly superior to the rights of the individual, and that kind of aristocracy is ugly to the marrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. I expected no better in the first place.
Whether it's Cheney's death squads, or Cheney's false flag attacks, or the serfdom economy, I'm not going to survive this anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. This story out of Ohio makes me SICK.. Check it out........
Edited on Sat Aug-13-05 11:37 PM by larissa
Columbus Dispatch - Columbus, Ohio, July 16, 2005

On the VERY day that Franklin County in Ohio is set to bid on new voting machines:

......"A contractor who represents Diebold Election Systems arrived at the office of Franklin County Board of Elections Director Matthew Damschroder with an open checkbook on the same day the county was opening bids for voter-registration software."

......"Pasquale "Pat" Gallina (of DIEBOLD) arrived unannounced, Damschroder said. "I’m here to give you $10,000," the elections director recalls Gallina saying. "Who do I make it payable to?"

Long story, short... Diebold tried to pay off the Franklin County Elections Director who would be reviewing bids and selecting new voting machines for his county later that day.
~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~

The elections director, Matthew Damschroder, told the Diebold Rep that he couldn't accept the $10,000.00 for the Elections Board, but said that their area Republican Party would love to have the money.

<--Matthew Damschroder, Elections Official, Republican, Dirtball

What makes me sick about the deal is that in this case, Diebold was caught red-handed trying to bribe elections officials to go with their corrupt systems.

Ken Blackwell seems to have saved their bacon though and they never got into trouble over the incident.

Also in the article, it mentions that Pat Gallina (same guy @ DIEBOLD) refused to say whether he had written Ken Blackwell a check for $50,000 the day before.

Makes you wonder how often Diebold goes around dispersing big bucks to areas that are about to bid for voting machines.

The elections official in this case was suspended according to a later article.. but he WASN'T FIRED!!

The only good news out of the whole corrupt deal is that Diebold wound up not winning the bid!

But you can tell from articles like this one how filthy-rotten CORRUPT they (and people like Ken Blackwell) are! :grr:

http://www.dispatch.com/election.php?story=dispatch/2005/07/16/20050716-A1-00.html&chck=t/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. america is a crime scene
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC