Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Detroit News: Is Bush the wartime president or the vacation president?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 12:22 AM
Original message
Detroit News: Is Bush the wartime president or the vacation president?
http://www.detnews.com/2005/metro/0508/15/B06-280425.htm

Is George W. Bush the wartime president or the vacation president? That seems like an obvious question following a recent report that Bush has spent more than 20 percent of his time as president hanging out at his vacation getaway on his ranch in Crawford, Texas.

Bush, who has made a point of emphasizing his status as the leader of the nation's war on terrorism, is currently on a five-week stretch at the ranch, a luxury most Americans can only fantasize about. That's the longest stretch away from the White House of any president in 36 years, according to the Washington Post.

The Post noted, "The August getaway is Bush's 49th trip to his cherished ranch since taking office and the 319th day that Bush has spent, entirely or partially, in Crawford -- nearly 20 percent of his presidency to date, according to Mark Knoller, a CBS Radio reporter known for keeping better records of the president's travel than the White House itself. Weekends and holidays at Camp David or at his parents' compound in Kennebunkport, Maine, bump up the proportion of Bush's time away from Washington even further."

This comes at the same time when the almost daily reports of roadside bombings and other insurgent attacks continue to take a deadly toll on United States soldiers and other personnel working to help implement democracy in Iraq. So far, more than 1,800 Americans have lost their lives since the invasion of Iraq two years ago and more than 14,000 have been wounded, many with permanent disabling injuries. The image of the Republican president callously at play while troops risk their lives is pretty much a political target with a bull's-eye on it for Democrats and other critics of the president.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Detroit News is a conservative paper
They endorsed Bush in 2000. In 2004, this was their endorsement:

"Four years ago, the choice was clear. We endorsed George W. Bush based on his promises of fiscal conservatism, limited government and prudence in foreign affairs.

Today, we sadly acknowledge that the president has failed to deliver on those promises.

At the same time, we are fearful of the approaches to government advocated by the Democratic challenger, Sen. John Kerry, because they are at odds with the conservative vision of government that has long shaped this newspaper's editorial positions.

So we are left with a decision we detest but are nonetheless compelled to make: The Detroit News will not lend its endorsement to a candidate who has made too many mistakes, nor to one who offers a governing philosophy that we reject."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. in other words, they have blood on their hands
they can go to hell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's one way to look at it
and I can't fault you for that, certainly.

Another way to look at it is that they are a conservative paper, and have (finally) figured out that this is not a conservative president, nor a conservative administration. As bad as the Detroit News is, BushCo is too fringe radical for them, and they know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. again, they can f*** themselves
I feel nothing but disgust and contempt for these bastards who supported this incompetent, lying piece of SHIT. NOW they get it? AT WHAT F***ING COST? THEY CAN GO TO HELL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Um ... nobody here is defending them
They don't have a good history in this town anyway because of their labor relations.

Given a choice between them continuing to sing Bush's praises, or denouncing his actions, I prefer the second option. That's all I was trying to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poetsdream Donating Member (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think they are waking up
You're right, the Det News is a conservative paper; but they are in a town where unemployment and government policies have had a devestating impact on its citizens.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sounds like a mandate to me!
Bush should be proud of himself for inspiring such a ringing endorsement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. Too Little Too Fuckin Late.....The DNews is cleaning its ACT...
Fuck um, Its too fucking late guys, the Nation is fucked and you were part of it.

Stay with him, stay the course, keep losing, keep dying, keep paying higher gass, Fuck it all, go outside and punch the guy to your right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC