Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The next House race in California: another Hackett?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 09:54 AM
Original message
The next House race in California: another Hackett?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Could be
The Democrats don't have real good candidate right now, but we'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waldnorm Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yahoo Article Only Acknowleges Right Wing Candidates in Article
Love how the story does not even acknowledge Democrats in the article. Here's Swing State Project's description of who's currently in the race:

http://www.swingstateproject.com/2005/08/ca-48_election.php



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. don't get your hopes too high

We're not going to find a great protest candidate or electorate in search of one every time. And winning is not that crucial in these kinds of districts.

The real prize is a little tsunami on November 8, 2006, that takes out 25 to 35 House Republicans in Democratic or swing districts. Remember that Democrats holding Republican districts tend to be pretty passive- their main use to the Party is to keep Republicans from holding/using their seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I think it's very important to test special elections prior to 2006
Again this is another Republican stronghold - formally held by right-wing nutbag Dornan. The turnout for special elections is usually low - if we can rally our base and field a decent candidate we may have a chance. Bush has never been less popular and the Republicans in Congress have a very low favorable rating as well. It'll be very hard to find a candidate as perfect as Hackett but we should definitely try hard. Every one you take now gets us one seat closer to taking back the house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyElvis Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Another
Diebold stronghold?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Nope
IIRC, CA's Secretary of State told Diebold to get out of the state last year, and then Barabara Boxer went on to win re-election with a 20% margin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. we should definately show up and make a race of it
I bet if we spent $100k in that district, it would force the GOP to spend $1million

I'm going to check out open secrets.org and see what happened last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. just what I thought, the DEM spent $1500 and raised $40.00
A very nice man and likely a truly dedicated Democrat that saw it as his moral and patriotic duty to stand up and run.

If DU, DailyKos, swing state majority and some of the other great sites out there can just raise $20 or $30k, it could have a huge impact, build the base, possibly get national attention again AND force the GOP to spend $2 or $3million where Cox "only" had to spend $1million.



Total Raised and Spent
2004 RACE: CALIFORNIA DISTRICT 48

Christopher Cox (R)*
(65% of vote)

Raised: $1,120,427
Spent: $1,038,914
Cash on hand: $568,711
Last Report: 12/31/2004


PACs: $465,789 (42%)
Individuals: $638,813 (57%)
Candidate: $0 -
Other: $15,825 (1%)


John L. Graham (D)
(32% of vote)

Raised: $40
Spent: $1,528
Cash on hand: $0
Last Report: -


PACs: $0 -
Individuals: $40 (100%)
Candidate: $0 -
Other: $0 -


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is a good test. Dean said...
we would contest every election. We should have someone there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC