Thanks for further disseminating this, pj!
This is the email I sent (I even excerpted the Raw Story copy, just in case they are UNAWARE--ha!--of what is going on in their world):
Subject: PLEASE cover the hearing on detainee abuses set for Thursday!
This is REAL NEWS, of the most important sort... why I even have to write to ask you to do your jobs is beyond me, but write and call I will, again and again, until you guys start doing so on your own.
This is an important public trust you've been charged with; PLEASE start acting as such.
D X Stone
-------------------
Excerpted from Raw Story
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Judge_rules_in_favor_of_holding_public_hearings_on_detainee__0816.htmlJudge rules in favor of holding public hearings on detainee abuse
Larisa Alexandrovna
Following the latest round of filings by the Department of Defense in conjunction with the State Department -which attempts to stipulate that all current and future photographs and tapes of detainee abuse be permanently sealed and, in addition, the reasons given for the motion be heavily redacted - the court ruled largely in favor of public disclosure.
The government's most recent motion was filed several weeks back when it missed its deadline for the release of all documents pursuant to the ACLU's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) suit, which has forced the release of over 60 thousand documents thus far in relation to detainee abuse and torture.
Judge Hellerstein stated that the public had an "educational interest" in the reasons for sealing the abuse documents, and scheduled a public hearing for this Thursday.
Congressman John Conyers (D-MI) issued a comment to Raw Story, saying that, "by attempting to keep the abuse cases secret
the legal arguments they offered, the Administration is breaking new ground in their effort to insulate themselves from public review."
"It is truly Kafkaesque to envision a government which does not even permit its legal arguments to be disclosed for publlic scrutiny," continued Conyers. "This not only violates the Freedom of Information Act, it turns the Act on its head."