Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Theft of the 2004 Election by Dr. Dennis Loo @ Cal Poly

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 05:26 PM
Original message
Theft of the 2004 Election by Dr. Dennis Loo @ Cal Poly
http://www.projectcensored.org/newsflash/voter_fraud.html

those wacky Florida voters ......

<The fact that Bush far exceeded the 85% of registered Florida Republicans’ votes that he got in 2000, receiving in 2004 more than 100% of the registered Republican votes in 47 out of 67 Florida counties, 200% of registered Republicans in 15 counties, and over 300% of registered Republicans in 4 counties, merely shows Floridians’ enthusiasm for Bush. He managed to do this despite the fact that his share of the crossover votes by registered Democrats in Florida did not increase over 2000 and he lost ground among registered Independents, dropping 15 points.>


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good article, more and more people are catching on
and the corporate media continues to ignore it. Cal Poly is serious business, too. The guy who wrote this and the writers of other, similar articles are heavy weights and yet it gets ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is this one true?
18) It must be merely a stunning coincidence that exit polls were wrong only in precincts where there was no paper ballot to check against the electronic totals and right everywhere there was a paper trail

I thought there was some debate on that. I can't recall the types of ballot in new Hampshire where they did the "recount"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihelpu2see Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wonder if Truth has seen this paper
This is very much the sort of thing he picked up on months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Mark Crispin Miller has a new book on election fraud coming out
Mark Crispin Miller, professor of media studies at New York University, was on INN World Report this evening. He said that Ohio was just the tip of the iceberg and he has compiled massive evidence from around the country that shows how the theft of election '04 took place. His article in this month Harper's Magazine called "None Dare Call It Stolen - Ohio, the Election, and America's Servile Press" comprises just one portion of his new book, Fooled Again: How the Right Stole the 2004 Election & Why They'll Steal the Next One Too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broken Acorn Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. And the beat goes on....
This topic will never die, although the media desperately wants it to go away. I don't know what it will take for this thing to get blown wide open.

Without the help of a MAJOR whistleblower, the majority of Americans will continue to sleepwalk through a once great Republic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC