Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush meltdown-Dems don't want their fingerprints on it.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
European Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 06:02 AM
Original message
Bush meltdown-Dems don't want their fingerprints on it.
LIHOP instead of MIHOP for some reason. Maybe they think it's better for 2006 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Lao Tzu said, regarding LIHOP:
When the effective leader is finished with his work, the people say it happened naturally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Bush couldn't even "fool some of the people all of the time."
Not that I want to argue with Abe Lincoln, but it's a fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Nice quote.
Good reference lvx35.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm confused; what are you referring to?
I don't see any LIHOP/MIHOP discussion happening in the MSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
European Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Dems not going for the jugular on Bush....
They don't want to be blamed for his demise. (not 911 issue)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. but it would be such a credit to be blamed for his demise!
Again, they get it all wrong.

With the exception of maybe 20 Dems, we need a clean sweep.


Cher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Eh, I don't know...maybe not.
You've got to admit there's sort of a poetic beauty to letting a thing crash by its own flaws...Its like communism. If we had really brought the Soviet system down, people would still be saying that Soviet communism would have worked without interferance. But now people know its a flawed system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. There's no poetic beauty in leaving the DINOS's in the party
More then half of Dem officials are part of the flawed system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, cleaning needs to be done. But Bush's demise is beautiful on its own!
All the moreso if he brings it about himself. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mourningdove92 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. It is better.
Right now the focus is on how bad Bush is doing. The focus is not on how Bad some Dem says Bush is doing.

And in their desperation to cover for Bush, they tried swift boating a mother of a young man who died in Iraq.

Why did they do this? No one else to swift boat at this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. First it was Hillary, then Valerie Plame, Teresa H Kerry,
then J Miller, though far from being a saint, is suffering (twisting in the breeze) for this administrations misdeeds. Now Cindy is the latest target of the Republican machine.

I bet you can name at least six more women who have been targeted by the brave men of the GOP.

Cindy Sheehan is just one of a long line of women attacked, or left twisting in the breeze by the Republicans. Why fight in our wars when there are women to smack around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC