|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
quaoar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 08:46 AM Original message |
Nader: Democrats made me feel like a (n-word) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 08:47 AM Response to Original message |
1. yet another reason Nader is the classiest guy around! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
2. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlyvi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
3. He really has no clue at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 09:08 AM Response to Original message |
4. Nader makes me sick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 04:52 PM Response to Reply #4 |
22. If you don't put that energy into ousting the DLC - there's going to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 05:01 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Deserting the party will show those DLC bastards, all right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radio4progressives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 05:06 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. If the DLC isn't OUSTED from the Party - We will be FORCED to run a THIRD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spaniard (157 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 05:32 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. do it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 05:41 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. No force about it, there will be a third party candidate, there always is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gildor Inglorion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 09:08 AM Response to Original message |
5. Poor ol' Ralph...he's the political equivalent of Orson Welles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 09:13 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. The sad thing is, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBHagman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 10:00 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. I know. He could have put his energy into, for example... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 12:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. You nailed it. That's what makes his incessant need for approval |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaoar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 03:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. He'll soon follow up with the R word |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebigidea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 03:25 PM Response to Reply #5 |
17. oh, fuck that. Welles made tons of interesting films post-Kane. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 05:26 PM Response to Reply #5 |
25. "We'll sell no whine before it's time" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zanne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
7. We hurt his feelings? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pansypoo53219 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
8. he really is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lexingtonian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
10. stuck in 1975 for the rest of his life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark E. Smith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
11. Maybe he meant "Nut" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
12. He doesnt qualify for any of the meanings of the word, good or bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gulliver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
13. Nader is the a-word. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rainscents (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
14. Hmmmmmmmmmm... I remember, he got his money from Right wing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alva Goldbook (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
18. Nader rocks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 04:34 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. I had enormous respect for Nader pre-2004; even waivered in my GE vote in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
19. 5 years of Bush and he's still whining about the Dems? This is so tired. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hayu_lol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 04:21 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Nader and Bush have the same problem... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-21-05 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
28. How the fuck would he know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:12 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC