Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsweek: Hunting Big Game (PA Santorum/Casey Race)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 03:41 PM
Original message
Newsweek: Hunting Big Game (PA Santorum/Casey Race)
Edited on Sun Aug-21-05 03:47 PM by RamboLiberal
Beware - Howard Fineman wrote this, but it does make me feel less than thrilled with Casey.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9023597/site/newsweek/

Cambria County is Pennsylvania deer-hunter territory, and you had better be careful before you criticize an American war or a commander in chief. In these Alleghenies, full of devout descendants of Eastern European millworkers, you carry a rifle into the woods—and serve in the military—as a way of life. That's why Democrat Bob Casey Jr. treaded as carefully as a hunter with a buck in view when he campaigned last week at Ed Cernic's annual picnic on a hillside above Johnstown. Seeking votes in his campaign to oust Rick Santorum, perhaps the Senate's most vulnerable Republican, Casey mentioned Iraq once—and then only to laud "the valor of those young men and women who are dying for us" there. But in an interview with NEWSWEEK, Casey crept closer to his target. Santorum, he said, "was not asking the tough questions of this president. What we need most of all to go forward are facts—and this administration isn't giving them to us and leaders such as Santorum aren't asking for them."

Even in deer-hunter country Iraq is an issue, and it could well be a central one in next year's congressional elections. But the terrain is tricky. Democrats see that the conflict is eroding President Bush's job-approval numbers, but they are wary of being portrayed as proponents of a "cut and run" policy, already one of Karl Rove's pet slogans. Republicans want to demonstrate their independence of judgment on the issue, but need to find a way to do so without seeming to abandon Bush or spark debilitating intraparty feuds.

At least for now, Democratic candidates largely have avoided getting too close to the Cindy Sheehan Show, and few seem interested in joining Sen. Russ Feingold's call, due this week, for a firm timetable for withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. Casey opposes the idea. "I think to do that, you risk giving the enemy information they shouldn't have," he said. Democrats are offering themselves as concerned supply officers eager to ensure that soldiers get body armor, medical care for their families—and an Iraqi Army capable of taking over. It's a popular message in Cambria County, which, not surprisingly, has sent an unusually large contingent of reservists and National Guard to Iraq.

Republicans will try to force the Democrats off that safe ground by demanding answers to more fundamental questions. Casey says that he would have voted for the Iraq war resolution "based on the facts at the time and what the president told us" and for the appropriations bills to pay for it. "I don't think we'll know for a while" if the Iraq invasion has made America safer, he said, but he adds that "there is no doubt that people here in Pennsylvania think that we're better off without Saddam Hussein." Santorum claimed rhetorical victory. "He answered the questions the same way I did," he said.

Casey needs to make the Iraq case even in rural areas like Johnstown. See this comment from Murtha.

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05233/557583.stm

"Get out; get out of Iraq; that's the overwhelming reaction,'' said Rep. John P. Murtha, D-Johnstown, who supported invading Iraq to get rid of Saddam Hussein but has been sharply critical of the administration's post-invasion performance. "People understand the danger there," said Murtha, a Vietnam veteran. "They see the carnage and they feel they were misled.''

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. They're right about the deer hunters. 45 years ago, my FIL was
a declared Pub because he said them damn libs were gonna take your guns away! He was a blue collar worker, union member, lower middle class income earner, in Pittsburgh Pa. Nothing else mattered to him! He was born in Center County Pa, which is the heart of hunting country in the state. That opinion hasn't changed in all these years.

I have managed, through logical thinking, to change my husband and at least one of our two sons to be liberal supporters. The one son is a bit of a challenge, not because of guns, but because he was in the military for 15 years. As I told him...he was brain washed! He needs to start looking at things like they really are! He's improving!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC