Something Durbin Said In CNN'S "Dead Wrong"
orleans
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-21-05 11:08 PM
Original message |
Something Durbin Said In CNN'S "Dead Wrong" |
|
I don't quite understand.
He said he heard something in committee or it was explained to the committee and then he would pick up a newspaper later and read that the white house was saying something different. and it was "against the law" for him to go to the paper and "say something's wrong here"
why is it against the law for him to talk to the paper/press and say something was wrong.
i don't get it.
(i wasn't able to tape the show but i think my two quotes are correct--i wrote them down quickly)
my impression was it had something to do with either cheney's saying iraq had wmd crap or bushie reconstituting their nuclear programs or something along that line.
but why couldn't durbin SAY ANYTHING? why was it against the law for him to talk to the press and call the white house on their lies?
can someone please help me understand this?
|
Eric J in MN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-21-05 11:10 PM
Response to Original message |
1. If it was a classified intelligence briefing, then it would |
|
be illegal for him to publicize.
|
Crunchy Frog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-21-05 11:10 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I'm wondering if it was in reference to classified information. |
|
That's the only explanation I could think of.
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-21-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message |
3. It goes back to getting "journalists" involved; |
|
politicians are not supposed to share inside info w/reporters, despite what Rove has done. Durbin has more integrity but was troubled by the two differing stories-what he was told as a Senator vs. what was being leaked/reported.
|
orleans
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-21-05 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. that makes sense. can you imagine |
|
how horrible and frustrating that was for him and anyone else in that committee with a conscience?
how terrible!
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-21-05 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Really horrible; think about it. We |
|
probably have more Dems than we realize in the same boat as Durbin. Hell, we were ALL lied to, and by a bunch of pros.
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. And the rule is...Never play by their rules. |
|
There must be ways to let reporters know the White House was lying without giving the classified info. Amazing how the WH was able to leak all that classified stuff.
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Very eye-opening; I'm waiting to see when |
|
Congress gets back in session what attitudes will prevail, as the tide seems to have turned since they left for summer. I'm an eternal optimist!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:35 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.