|
The world has changed, 9/11 was the halmark event that announced the change, but was not the beginning. The reality is that the US represents about 3% of the world's population and if you have a household income over 100,000 (USD) you are in about the top 2% of income earners in the world. Much of the 'third world' which represents 60-75% of the world's population now want a better deal.
Western militaries (the US, UK etc) which have been used to keep the barbarian hordes at bay are no longer much of a threat, both because much of the world no longer has alot to lose, and because it's been demonstrated that although they can inflict damage and casualties, these forces cannot ultimately win a war abroad as long as their opponents are determined. The freepers and hawks will say that the US still has nukes but, if you look into the collapse of the USSR you will find that there are alot of nukes out there. You should assume that anyone who really wants a nuke, can have one so it would be absurd to go to this option. The laws of mutual assured destruction are still in play.
Add to this the ascendancy of China and India and peak oil and you will have a fairly good picture of what the Bush administration is really fighting (not terrorism). The reality is that the US standard of living will come down and US power in the world is declining sharply. What remains to be seen, what is still being debated, is whether the US (and the west in general) is going to negotiate the new deal or try to arrive at a new deal through it's military. The more the US goes with the second option, the worse the deal is going to be.
|