Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I have a question: with **'s numbers totally in the shitter,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 03:02 PM
Original message
I have a question: with **'s numbers totally in the shitter,
why shouldn't we be able to deep six the Roberts nomination?

Come on sharks, there's blood in the water.

COME & GIT IT!!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because the corporate media are all saying he's a shoe-in.
I don't think Bushco should be allowed to nominate anybody or make any policy while there's an "ongoing investigation".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. you said it better than I .
You would think they would abandon ship. Back in the day, Congress turned on Nixon...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Bolton was a shoe-in, too
And Chimpy had to wait until Congress left town to do the recess appointment thing. Now we have a UN ambassador who doesn't have any credibility, and the other UN member nations know they can safely ignore Bolton's loonier rantings or just run the clock on him without fear of any penalty.

It should be easy enough to delay Roberts' nomination: Just insist that before the Senate approves young Mr. Roberts for his lifetime appointment, it is necessary that they have a chance to review his entire record. The White House nominated him; it can't possibly come as a surprise to the administration that the Senate needs to consider the entirety of his record in order to carry out its constitutional duty to advise and consent.

Would YOU hire someone for life without a thorough check of his background and record?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. I still haven't seen any Pubs in Congress jumping ship.
Edited on Mon Aug-22-05 03:23 PM by napi21
Sure, Hagel is talking against the war, but that's a different issue. I think, unless something bad comes out in the hearings, it's probably going to be Justice Roberts.

Edited title. I must e brain dead today...put the wrong damn party in the title! Sorry!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Recess isn't over yet
Maybe someone in Congress that is not part of the Corporatist cabal will finally say something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. I am savouring the title of your post.
That's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Still he won't slide
80,000 have applied for FOIA files on Roberts. He will not skate through without exposure. The problem is that the Repubs are in power and there is really not a lot Dems can do to stop them. Not in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC